Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 9, 2016
3rd European Conference on Unsaturated Soils – “E-UNSAT 2016”
Article Number 10002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Advances in Experimental Methods: Hydraulic Properties
Published online 12 September 2016
  1. G.E. Archie. Petroleum Transactions of AIME, 146 (1), pp. 54–62 (1942). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Kelly, R. Frohlich. Ground Water, 23 (2), pp. 182–189 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Sharma Environmental and engineering geophysics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–261 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Abu-Hassanein, C. Benson, L. Boltz, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(5), pp. 397–406 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Khalil, F. Santos. Developments in Hydraulic Conductivity Research, pp. 49–70. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Santamarina, K. Klein, M. Fam. (2001). Soils and Waves. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 336–341. [Google Scholar]
  7. D.A. Gunn, J.E. Chambers, S. Uhlemann, P.B. Wilkinson, P.I. Meldrum, T.A. Dijkstra, F. Haslam, M. Kirkham, J. Wragg, S. Holyoake, P.N. Hughes, R. Hen-Jones, S. Glendinning. Construction and Building Materials, 92, pp. 82–94 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Gingine, R. Cardoso, Soil Structure Influence on Electrokinetic Dewatering Process. Electrokinetics Across Disciplines and Continents, pp. 19–42, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. G.H. Bolt Géotechnique, 6(2), pp. 86–93 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. H. Wang, D. Xu. J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., Vol. 133(7), (2007).double layer e swelling potential [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Romero, A. Gens, A. Lloret. Engineering Geology, 54, pp. 117–127 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. S. Dias, Electrical resistivity of compacted kaolin and its relation with suction, MSc Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Romero, 4º Simpósio Brasileiro de Solos Não Saturados, pp. 535–542 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  14. BS 1377-3. Methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purposes. Chemical and electro-chemical tests (1990). [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Herman. Am. J. Phys., 69 (9). pp 943–952 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. van Genuchten. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 892–898 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. K. Vanapalli, D. G. Fredlund, D. E. Pufahl, Géotechique, 49 (2), pp. 143–159 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Fukue, T. Minato, H. Horibe, and N. Taya, Eng. Geol., 54, pp. 43–53 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.