Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 14, 2017
Energy and Fuels 2016
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 9
Section Fuels
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171402009
Published online 15 March 2017
  1. US EPA, Mercury study report to Congress, EPA-452/R-97-003, (US Government PrintingOffice, Washington DC 1997).
  2. US EPA, A study of hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utility steam generating units. Final Report to Congress, EPA-453/R-98-004a; (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC 1998).
  3. AMAP/UNEP, Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment, (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013).
  4. KOBiZE (National Centre for Emissions Management), Poland’s Informative Inventory, Report 2013.
  5. KOBiZE (National Centre for Emissions Management), Poland’s Informative Inventory, Report 2015.
  6. P. Burmistrz, K. Kogut, M. Marczak, J. Zwoździak, Fuel Process. Technol. 152 250–258 (2016). [CrossRef]
  7. T. Dziok, A. Strugała, A. Rozwadowski, M. Macherzyński, Fuel 159 206–213(2015). [CrossRef]
  8. M. Wichliński, R. Kobyłecki, Z. Bis, Arch. Environ. Protec. 39 141–150 (2013).
  9. I. Bojkowska, G. Sokolowska, Mercury in mineral raw materials exploited in Poland as potential sources of environmental pollution (PIG Bulletin, 2001).
  10. M.A. Lopez-Anton, Y. Yuan, R. Perry, M.M. Maroto-Valer, Analysis of mercury species present during coal combustion by thermal desorption, Fuel 89 629–634 (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. T. Gale, B. Lani, G. Offen, Fuel Process. Technol. 89 139 (2008). [CrossRef]
  12. M. Berry, R. Semmes, T. Campbell, S. Glesmann, R. Glesmann, Mat. Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Baltimore, MD, Curran Associates, 2006.
  13. S. Sjostrom, M. Durham, C.J. Bustard, C. Martin, Activated carbon injection for mercury control: Overview, Fuel 89 1320–1322 (2010). [CrossRef]
  14. S.B. Ghorishi, R.M. Keeney, S.D. Serre, et al., Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 4454–4459 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J.W. Graydon, X-Z. Zhang, D.W. Kirk, C.Q. Jia, Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control, J. Hazard. Mater. 168 (2-3) 978–982 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. Q. Zhou, Y-F. Duan, Y-G. Hong, et al., Experimental and kinetic studies of gas phase mercury adsorption by raw and bromine modified activated carbon, Fuel Process. Technol. 134 325–332 (2015). [CrossRef]
  17. L. Liberti, M. Notarnicola, V. Amicarelli, V. Campanaro, F. Roethel, L. Swanson, Waste Manag. Res. 16 2 (1998). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. W. Nowak, J. Pacyna, I. Majchrzak-Kucęba, Sorbenty z popiołu dla energetyki (2010).
  19. H. Clack, Methods for reducing mercury emission from coal combustion, In: Mercury as coal combustion pollutant, Kraków (2014).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.