Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 22, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Energy Systems and Environmental Engineering (ASEE17)
Article Number 00149
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 07 November 2017
  1. U.S. EPA, Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and Incorporation of Approaches to Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter (Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.J. Cimorelli, S.G. Perry, A. Venkatram, J.C. Weil, R.J. Paine, R.B. Wilson, R.F. Lee, W.D. Peters, R.W. Brode, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, pp. 682–693 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Venkatram, R.W. Brode, A.J. Cimorelli, R.F. Lee, R.J. Paine, S.G. Perry, W.D. Peters, J.C. Weil, R.B. Wilson, Atmos. Environ., 35, pp. 4211–4221 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Juda-Rezler, Arch. Environ. Prot., 36, 1, pp. 3–28 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. S.G. Perry, A.J. Cimorelli, R.J. Paine, R.W. Brode, J.C. Weil, A. Venkatram, R.B. Wilson, R.F. Lee, W.D. Peters, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 5, pp. 694–708 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A.L. Dresser, R.D. Huizer, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 61, 6, pp. 647–659 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A.S. Rood, Atmos. Environ., 89, pp. 707–720 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. G.A. Abril, S.C. Diez, M.L. Pignata, J. Britch, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 1, pp. 180–189 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. U.S. EPA, Evaluation of Prognostic Meteorological Data in AERMOD Applications (Report EPA-454/R-16-004, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Kumar, R.S. Patil, A.K. Dikshit, S. Islam, R. Kumar, J. Clean. Prod., 116, pp. 1–8, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Turtos Carbonell, G.C. Mastrapa, Y.F. Rodriguez, L. Alvarez Escudero, M. Sanchez Gacita, A B. Morlot, I.B. Montejo, E.M. Ruiz, S.P. Rivas, L.T. Carbonell, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 4, 1, pp. 64–74 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L.E. Truppi, EPA complex terrain model development: Description of a computer data base from the full scale plume study, Tracy Power Plant, Nevada (Report EPA/600/S3-86/068, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  13. U.S. EPA, Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling - Preferred and Recommended Models (available at:, accessed: 25-mar-2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. U.S. EPA, AERMOD: Latest features and evaluation results (Report EPA-454/B-03-001, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  15. W.C. Skamarock, J.B. Klemp, J. Dudhi, D.O. Gill, D.M. Barker, M.G. Duda, X.-Y. Huang, W. Wang, J.G. Powers, A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 (Report NCAR/TN-475+STR, Boulder, CO, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Mesinger, G. DiMego, E. Kalnay, K. Mitchell, P.C. Shafran, W. Ebisuzaki, D. Jovic, J. Woollen, E. Rogers, E.H. Berbery, M.B. Ek, Y. Fan, R. Grumbine, W. Higgins, H. Li, Y. Lin, G. Manikin, D. Parrish, W. Shi, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 3, pp. 343–360 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. U.S. EPA, Guidance on the Use of the Mesoscale Model Interface Program (MMIF) for AERMOD Applications (Report EPA-454/B-15-001, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. W.M. Cox, J.A. Tikvart, Atmos. Environ., 24A, 9, pp. 2387–2395 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Hanna, J. Chang, Atmos. Phys., 116, 3–4, pp. 133–146 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Giovannini, D. Zardi, M. de Franceschi, F. Chen, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 4, pp. 1111–1131 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Giovannini, G. Antonacci, D. Zardi, L. Laiti, L. Panziera, Energy Procedia, 59, pp. 323–329 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, Q. Zhang, F. Duan, K. He, Atmos. Environ., 124, pp. 285–300 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.