Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 29, 2018
XVIIth Conference of PhD Students and Young Scientists
Article Number 00009
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182900009
Published online 31 January 2018
  1. J. Karliński, E. Rusinski, T. Smolnicki, Autom. Constr. 17, 232 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Kalita, Min. Mach. 1, 16 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Karliński, M. Ptak, P. Działak, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 13, 57 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Kaneda, T. Tamagawa, Komatsu Tech. Rep. 49, 2 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. N. J. Perera, D. P. Thambiratnam, B. Clark, Australas. J. Min. Saf., 3, 68 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Butra, Eksploatacja złoża rud miedzi w warunkach zagrożenia tąpaniami i zawałami, KGHM Cuprum, Wrocław (2010) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Goszcz, Elementy mechaniki skał oraz tąpania w polskich kopalniach węgla i miedzi, SEP, Kraków (1999) [Google Scholar]
  8. WUG, Raport o stanie bezpieczeństwa pracy w polskich kopalniach (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Rusiński, P. Moczko, D. Pietrusiak, J. Mech. Eng. 59, 556 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ptak, E. Rusiński, J. Karliński, S. Dragan, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 12, 68 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Smolnicki, M. Stańco, D. Pietrusiak, Tech. Gaz. 20, 831 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. https://www.tassinternational.com/madvmo-dummv-models, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. FAA, Hybrid II and Federal Aviation Administration Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Dummy Dynamic Evaluation Test Series, NTIS, Springfield, Virginia (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. http://www.gom.com/metrologv-svstems.html, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. T.J.R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Dover, New York (2000) [Google Scholar]
  16. https://www.mpips.gov.pl/ubezpieczenia-spoleczne/ubezpieczenia-wvpadkowe/definicje-zawarte-w-ustawie-o-ubezpieczeniu-spolecznvm-z-tvtulu-wvpadkow-przv-pracv-i-chorob-zawodowvch/uszczerbek-na-zdrowiu (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. FAA Regulation 29 – Airworthiness standards: Transport category rotorcraft, Emergency landing conditions (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. S.P. Desjardins, AHS J. 51, 150 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Jamroziak, Modell. Eng. 42, 179 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. NHTSA, Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems, Washington, DC (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. B.D. Stemper, N. Yoganandan, F.A. Pintar, B.S. Shender, G.R. Paskoff, Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 80, 489 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. T.A. Gennarelli, E. Wodzin, Inj. 37, 1083 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P.M. Cartera, C.A.C. Flannagana, M.P. Reeda, R.M. Cunninghama, J.D. Rupp, Accid. Anal. Prev. 72, 146 (2014) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.