Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 30, 2018
The First Conference of the International Water Association IWA for Young Scientist in Poland “Water, Wastewater and Energy in Smart Cities”
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 9
Section Water
Published online 06 February 2018
  1. T. G. Schmitt: Kommentar zum Arbeitsblatt A 118 "Hydraulische Bemessung und Nachweis von Entwässerungssystemen". DWA, Hennef (in German) (2000) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Licznar, J. Lomotowski, D. E. Rupp: Random cascade driven rainfall disaggregation for urban hydrology: An evaluation of six models and a new generator. Atmospheric Research 99, 563–578 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Alfieri, F. Laio, P. Claps: A simulation experiment for optimal design hyetograph selection, Hydrological Processes 22, 813-820 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Urcikán, J. Horváth: Synthetic design storm and its relation to Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves. Water Science and Technology Vol. 16 No 8-9, 69–83, (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Arnell: Rainfall data for the design of sewer pipe systems; with the supplement: Description and Validation of the CTH-Urban Runoff Model, Report Series A:8, Chalmers University of Technology, Dept. of Hydraulics, Goteborg, Sweden (1982) [Google Scholar]
  6. N. El-Jabi, S. Sarrat: Effect of Maximum Rainfall Position on Rainfall-Runoff Relationship. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117 (5), 681-685 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. J. Keifer, H. H. Chu: Synthetic rainfall pattern for drainage design. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 83 (HY4), 1-25 (1957) [Google Scholar]
  8. B. J. Adams, C. D. D. Howard: Design storm pathology, Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques, 11:3, 49-55 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Vigilone, G. Blöschl: On the role of storm duration in the mapping of the rainfall to flood return period. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 205-216, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. B. Stall, M. L. Terstriep: Storm sewer design - an evaluation of the RRL method. Office of Research and Monitoring US EPA, Washington (1972) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. J. Boyd, M. C. Bufill, R. M. Knee: Predicting pervious and impervious storm runoff from urban drainage basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 39:4, 321-332 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. EN 752: Drain and sewer systems outside buildings. PKN, Warszawa (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Kaźmierczak, A. Kotowski: Weryfikacja przepustowości kanalizacji deszczowej w modelowaniu hydrodynamicznym. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Inżynierii Ochrony Środowiska Politechniki Wrocławskiej 92 Seria: Monografie 57, Wroclaw (in Polish) (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. ASCE: Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems. ASCE Manuals and Reports of Engineering Practice no. 77, WEF Manual of Practice FD-20 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Mazurkiewicz: Wyznaczanie charakterystyki opadu obliczeniowego dla potrzeb modelowania odpywu ze zlewni miejskiej. Rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Poznanska (in Polish) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. L. L. da Silveira: Cumulative equations for continuous time Chicago hyetograph method. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hidricos/Brasilian Journal of Water Resources, Porto Alegre, v. 21, n. 3, 646-651 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Bogdanowicz, J. Stachý: Maksymalne opady deszczu w Polsce. Charakterystyki projektowe. Materialy badawcze, seria: Oceanologia i Hydrologia, IMGW, Warszawa (in Polish) (1998) [Google Scholar]
  18. L. A. Rossman: Storm Water Management Model User's Manual Version 5.1, 09.2015, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Skotnicki, M. Sowinski: Dokladność odwzorowania stopnia uszczelnienia zlewni cząstkowych w modelowaniu odplywu ze zlewni miejskiej. Gaz Woda i Technika Sanitarna, 7-8, 276-279 (in Polish) (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.