Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 30, 2018
The First Conference of the International Water Association IWA for Young Scientist in Poland “Water, Wastewater and Energy in Smart Cities”
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Wastewater
Published online 06 February 2018
  1. EPA. Assessment, E. R. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment.(1998) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. W. Suter II, Ecological risk assessment. CRC press.(2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. A.Hadipour, T.Rajaee, V.Hadipour&S.Seidirad, Multi-criteria decision-making model for wastewater reuse application: a case study from Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(30), 13857-13864.(2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E.Wąsik, K.Chmielowski&A. Operacz, PCA jako narzędzie eksploracji danych charakteryzujących pracę komór nitryfikacji oczyszczalni ścieków w Trepczy. ActaScientiarumPolonorumFormatioCircumiectus, 16(1), 209–222. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Wąsik, P. Bugajski, K. Chmielowski, A. Nowak &R. Mazur. Crystallization of struvite and hydroxyapatite during removal of biogenic compounds on the filter bed. PrzemysłChemiczny, 96/8, 1739–1743.(2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Kaszycki, P. Petryszak&H. Kołaczek. "Biological treatment of wastewaters generated by furniture industry part 2. Construction of a specialized activated sludge and optimization of bioprocess parameters in semi-technical scale tests." Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. A 15.11 1257-1271.(2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. G. T.Ooi, M. E.Casas, H. R.Andersen&K. Bester. Transformation products of clindamycin in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Water Research, 113, 139-148.(2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. E.Wąsik&K. Chmielowski, Ammonia and indicator bacteria removal from domestic sewage in a vertical flow filter filled with plastic material. Ecological Engineering, Volume 106, Part A, Pages 378–384. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Bugajski, K. Chmielowski&G. Kaczor,Optimizing the Percentage of Sewage from Septic Tanks for Stable Operation of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(4), 1421–1425. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Mazur, D. Bedla, K. Chmielowski, A. Nowak&J. Mazurkiewicz, Wpływ warunków tlenowych na skuteczność oczyszczania ścieków bytowych w technologii zatapialnych filtrów włókninowych. Przemysł Chemiczny, 96(8), 1513-1517. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Chmielowski&R. Slizowski. Effect of grain-size distribution of sand on the filtrate quality in vertical-flow filters. PrzemysłChemiczny, 87(5), 432-434. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  12. P.Bugajski, K.Chmielowski&G. Kaczor,Wpływ wielkości dopływu wód opadowych na skład ścieków surowych w małym systemie kanalizacyjnym. Acta ScientiarumPolonorumFormatioCircumiectus, 15(2), 3–11.(2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Leiknes&H. Ødegaard,The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 202(1), 135-143.(2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H.Ødegaard, B.Rusten&F. Wessman, State of the art in Europe of the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process. In Proceedings of the 77th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exposition and Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, (2-6).(2004). [Google Scholar]
  15. K.Chmielowski&R. Ślizowski, Defining the optimal range of a filter bed's d(10) replacement diameter in vertical flow sand filters. Environment Protection Engineering, 34(3), 35-42.(2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. R.Kollmann, G. Neugebauer, F.Kretschmer, B.Truger, H.Kindermann, G.Stoeglehner&M. Narodoslawsky, Renewable energy from wastewater-Practical aspects of integrating a wastewater treatment plant into local energy supply concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 119-129.(2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Andreottola, P. Foladori, M. Ragazzi&F. Tatano,Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Science & Technology, 41(4), 375-382.(2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Miksch&J. Sikora, Biotechnologia ścieków" Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN(2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. R.Delatolla, B.Young &A. Stintzi, Application of the MBBR Technology to Achieve Nitrification Below 1° C: Biofilm and Microbiome Analysis. In Frontiers International Conference on Wastewater Treatment and Modelling (pp. 513-517). Springer, Cham.(2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T.Abzazou, R., M.Araujo, M. Auset&H. Salvadó, Tracking and quantification of nitrifying bacteria in biofilm and mixed liquor of a partial nitrification MBBR pilot plant using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Science of the Total Environment, 541, 1115-1123.(2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. B.Young, R.Delatolla, K.Kennedy, E.Laflamme&A. Stintzi, Low temperature MBBR nitrification: Microbiome analysis. Water Research.(2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. A.Kamstra, E. Blom&B. F. Terjesen, Mixing and scale affect moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance. Aquacultural Engineering.(2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Mᐥyński, K. Chmielowski & A. Młyńska, The analysis of the quantity variability of the sewage inflowing to the selected wastewater treatment plants of Sanok district ActaSci.Pol. Form. Cir. 16.1: 77-89. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. B.Rusten, B.Eikebrokk, Y.Ulgenes&E. Lygren, Design and operations of the Kaldnes moving bed biofilm reactors. Aquaculturalengineering, 34(3), 322-331.(2006). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.