Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 12
Section 03. Environmental Technology
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. S. Hasiany, E. Noor, and M. Yani, Journal of Natural Resources and Environment Management, 5(1), pp.25–32, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Ahmadun, A. Pendashteh, and L. Chuah, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, pp.530–551, (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Ekins, R. Vanner, J. Firebrace, J. Clean. Prod., 15, 1302–1315, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Khatib, P. Verbeek, Water to value-produced water management for sustainable field development of mature and green fields, in: SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–22 March, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ministry of Environment, Regulation of the Minister of Environment Number 19 Year of 2010 regarding the quality standard of waste water for businesses and/or activities of oil and gas and geothermal, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  6. J.M. Neff, Bioaccumulation in Marine Organisms: Effect of Contaminants from Oil Well Produced Water, Elsevier, The Netherlands, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  7. USEPA, [Google Scholar]
  8. G.T. Tellez, N. Nirmalakhandan, J.L. Gardea-Torresdey, Advances in Environmental Research, 6, 455–470, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B.R. Hansen, S.H. Davies, Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 72, 176–188, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  10. J.P. Fillo, S.M. Koraido, J.M. Evans, Environmental Science Research, 46, 151-162, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  11. D.T. Bostick, H. Luo, H. Hindmarsh, Characterization of Soluble in Produced Water, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (2002)., Online:03-07-2017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. About produced water (Produced water 101) Available: Online:03-07-2017 [Google Scholar]
  13. A white paper describing produced water from production of crude oil, natural gas, and coal bed methane. Available: Online:04-07-2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Chen, L. Zhao, K. Lee, and C. Hannath, Water Quality Research Journal Canada, 42, 303–310, (2007a). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. F. Payne, C. Andrews, L. Fancey, B. French, and Lee, K, Risks to fish associated with barium in drilling fluids and produced water: A chronic toxicity study with Cunner (Tautogolabrus adspersus). In K. Lee, & J. Neff (Eds.), (pp. 401–417). New York: Produced Water, Springer, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Schifter, et al.,. Environ Monit Assess, 187, p.723, (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. P.J.C. Tibbetts, I.T. Buchanan, L.J. Gawel, R. Large, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp. 97–113, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  18. R.P.M.W. Jacobs, R.O.H. Grant, J. Kwant, J.M. Marquenie, E. Mentzer, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp. 13–22, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  19. T.I.R. Utvik, Composition, Characteristics of produced water in the North Sea, in: Produced Water Workshop, Aberdeen, Scotland, 26–27 March, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. M. Johnson, L. E. Kanagy, J. H. Rodgers Jr., J.W. Castle, Water Air Soil Pollut, 191, pp. 33–54, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J.P. Fillo, J.M. Evans, American Gas Association Operation Section Proceedings, pp.448–459, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  22. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). EPA Office of Compliance Sector Notebook Project: Profile of the Oil and Gas Extraction Industry. EPA/310-R-99-006, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  23. M.C. Shepherd, F.L. Shore, S.K. Mertens, J.S. Gibson, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp. 163–174, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  24. Gazali, A.K. et al., Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 7(6), pp.22–29, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Bakke, J. Klungsøyr, and S. Sanni, Marine Environmental Research, 92, pp.154–169, (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Neff, K. Lee, E.M. DeBlois, Produced water: overview of composition, fates, and effects. In: Lee, K., Neff, J. (Eds.), Produced Water. Springer, New York (Chapter 1), (2011)., Available: Online : 05-07-2017 [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Odeigah, O. Nurudeen, and O. O. Amund, Hereditas 126 (2), 161-167, (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J.M. Neff, T.C. Sauer, N. Maciolek, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp.371–386, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  29. O. Obire, and F. Amusan, Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 7 (1), 61-66, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  30. DJ.K. Otton, Environmental Aspects of Produced-water Salt Releases in Onshore and Coastal Petroleum-producing Areas of the Conterminous, (2006)., Online : 05-07-2017 [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Isehunwa, and S. Onovae, Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, 6 (8), 66-71, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  32. T.I.R. Utvik, Chemosphere, 39, 2593–2606, (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Oil and gas produced water management and beneficial use in the western united states, Online : 05-07-2017 [Google Scholar]
  34. M.T. Stephenson, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp. 1–11, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  35. D.A. Pillard, J.E. Tietge, and J.M. Evans. 1996b. Estimating the acute toxicity of produced waters to marine organisms using predictive toxicity models. Pages 49-60 In: M. Reed and S. Johnsen (Eds.). 1996. Produced Water 2. Environmental Issues and Mitigation Technologies. Plenum Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Elias-Samlalsingh, J. B. R. Agard, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23, 1194–1203, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Boitsov, S.A. Mjøs, and S. Meier. Mar. Environ. Res. 64, 651-665, (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. S.B. Henderson, S.J.W. Grigson, P. Johnson, B.D. Roddie, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 38, 1141–1151, (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. S.J.W. Grigson, A. Wilkinson, P. Johnson, C.F. Moffat, A.D. Mcintosh, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14, 2210–2219, (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. J.V. Veil, Research to Improve Water-use Efficiency and Conservation: Technologies and Practice, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  41. J.D. Arthur, B.G. Langhus, C. Patel, Technical Summary of Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment Technologies, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  42. D.B. Boysen, J.E. Boysen, J.A. Boysen, Creative Strategies for Produced Water Disposal in the Rocky Mountain Region, (2002)., [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Stewart, K. Arnold, Emulsion and Oil Treating Equipment, Elsivier Inc., Oxford, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  44. J.A. Veil, M.G. Puder, D. Elcock and R. Jr. J. Redweik, A White Paper Describing Produced Water from Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal Bed Methane, US DOE (January 2004) W-31-109-Eng-38 [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Deng, R. Bai, J.P. Chen, Z. Jiang, G. Yu, F. Zhou, Z. Chen, Sep. Purif. Technol. 29, 207–216, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. W.M.G.T. Van den Broek, M.J. Van der Zande, Comparison of plate separator, centrifuge and hydrocyclone, in: SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, China, 2–6 November, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  47. T. Hayes, and D. Arthur, Overview of Emerging Produced Water Treatment Technologies. 11th Annual International Petroleum Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  48. M. N. Cakmakce, Kayaalp, et al. Desalination, 222(1-3), 176-186, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Broussard P. "Skip" Jr, Floatation Pump Proves Successful for The Treatment of Produced Water, paper presented at the 10th IPEC, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  50. ALL Consulting. Handbook on Coal Bed Methane Produced Water: Management and Beneficial Use Alternatives. Prepared by ALL, Consulting for the Ground Water Protection Research Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, and U.S. Bureau of Land Management, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  51. NETL. "Produced Water Management Technology Descriptions Fact Sheet.", [Google Scholar]
  52. J.J. Seureau, Y. Aurelle, M.E. Hoyack, A three-phase separator for the removal of oil and solids from produced water, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 25–28 September, (1994) [Google Scholar]
  53. Sinker, A. Produced Water Treatment Using Hydrocyclones: Theory and Practical Applications. 14th Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Houston, Texas, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  54. M.S. Carvalho, M.D. Clarisse, E.F. Lucas, C.C.R. Barbosa, Evaluation of the polymeric materials (DVB copolymers) for produced water treatment, in: SPE International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 13–16 October, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  55. J.S.Janks, F. Cadena, Environmental Science Research, 46, pp. 473–488, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  56. D.H. Doyle, F. Daniel, A.B. Brown, Field test of produced water treatment with polymer modified bentonite, in: SPE Rocky Mountain Regional meeting held in Casper, Wyoming, USA, 18–21 May, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  57. Y. He, Z.W.Jiang, Treating oilfield wastewater: technology review, Filtr. Sep. June (2008)14–16 [Google Scholar]
  58. Safitri, H.I. et al., Journal of chemical and industrial technology, 2(4), pp.205–211, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  59. S. Munirasu, M. Abu, and F. Banat, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 100, pp.183–202, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Abbasi, M. Mirfendereski, M. Nikbakht, M. Golshenas, T. Mohammadi, Desalination, 259, 169–178, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhu, X., Tu, W., Wee, K.-H., Bai, R., J. Membr. Sci. 466, 36–44, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Baker, R.W. (Ed.), Membrane Technolgoy and Applicatoins., second ed. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. D.D.C. Freire, M.C. Cammarota, G.L. Sant'Anna, Environ. Technol. 22, 1125–1135, (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. S. Hidayat, and E. Kardena, Removal Organic Compounds with Batch Reactor using Indogenous Bacteria and Additional Nutrition, (2007). Available at: [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.