Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017)
Article Number 09022
Number of page(s) 6
Section 09. Environmental Policy, Planning and Education
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health of Central Java Province, Masterplan of Livestock Area Development in Central Java Province. Semarang: Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health of Central Java Province, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Suhaema, “Area Analysis For The Development Of Beef Cattle In Cianjur District,” Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kementan, Beef Outlook. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture RI, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. A. Rouf, Daryanto, and Fariyanti, “Business Competitiveness of Beef Cattle in Indonesia: Domestic Approach Resources Cost,” Wartazoa, vol. Vol.24, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sumanto, E. Juarini, Wibowo, and Ashari, “Potential Areas For The Dissemination And Development Of Animal Husbandry In Yogyakarta Special Region,” Semin. Nas. Peternak. dan Veieriner, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. BPS, Blora In Figures 2016. Blora: Central Bureau of Statistics of Blora Regency, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Silanikove, “Effects of Heat Stress on the Welfare of Extensively Managed Domestic Ruminants,” Livest. Prod. Sci., vol. 67, no. October, pp. 1–18, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Kadarsih, “Performance of Bali Cattle Based on Elevation Place in Bengkulu Transmigration Area : II. Reproductive performance,” J. Penelit. UNIB, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. E. French, “Species Composition Determines Forage Quality and Medicinal Value of High Diversity Grasslands in Lowland England,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 241, pp. 193–204, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rusdin, “Several Influential Factors Against Community Responses Cattle Breeding In Parigi Moutong District,” J. Agrol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 301–308, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Atmiyati, “Carrying Support Forage Support to Livestock Development in Sambas District,” Temu Tek. Nas. Tenaga Fungsional Pertan., pp. 96–100, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Suharyanto, “Development Strategy of Buffalo-Based Plantation Oil Palm Plantation in Bengkulu Province,” Bengkulu, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Lasmawati, “Swot Analysis of Ruminant Animal Husbandry Development Based on the Potency of Forage Feed Using Visual Basic Programming Language 6.o,” Bogor, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Hardjowigeno and Widiatmaka, Evaluation of Land Suitability and Land Use Planning, Printed 2. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. A, K. Jamal, and C. Sumantri, “Estimation of Body Weight Through Morphometric analysis with Best Regression Approach Best - Subset on Garut Sheep Type Pedaging, Agile and Cross,” pp. 1–6, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Yani, H. Suhardiyanto, R. Hasbullah, and B. P. Purwanto, “Analysis and Simulation of Air Temperature Distribution on Dairy Cage Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD),” Media Breeders., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 218–228, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Rusmana, Atmiyati, and Ridwan, “Making Ecological Conformity Map For Ruminant Livestock On The Scale of Review,” Temu Tek. Nas. Tenaga Fungsional Pertan., 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haryono, Indigofera As Animal Feed. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Diwyanto, B. Prawiradwiputra, and D. Lubis, “Integration of Crops in the Development of Agribusiness Competitiveness, Sustainable and Sourced,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Teknol. Peternak. dan Vet., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Makkar, “Applications Of The In Vitro Gas Method In The Evaluation Of Feed Resources, And Enchancement Of Nutritional Value Of Tannin-Rich Tree/Browse Leaves and Agro-Industrial By-Products,” Dev. F. Eval. Anim. Feed Suppplementation Packag. Prooceeding Final Rev. Meet. An IAEA Tech. Coop. Reg. AFRA Proj. Organ. By Jt. FAO/IAEA, pp. 23–40, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ditjen PSP, Technical Guidelines for Extension of Farming Areas. Jakarta, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. KLH, Guidance on Determination of Environmental Support Capacity in Spatial Planning. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Ardhani, “Potential Areas for Livestock Development in Bulungan District, East Kalimantan Province,” EPP. Vol.5. No.1. 2008, vol. 5, no. No.1, pp. 36–43, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. T. Puntodewo.A, S.Dewi, “Geographic Information System for Natural Resource Management,” Cent. Int. For. Res., no. 2003, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Schlecht, P. Hiernaux, I. Kadaouré, C. Hülsebusch, and F. Mahler, “A spatio-temporal analysis of forage availability and grazing and excretion behaviour of herded and free grazing cattle, sheep and goats in Western Niger,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 113, no. 1-4, pp. 226–242, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. M. Colby and Y. J. Johnson, “Potential uses for geographic information system-based planning and decision support technology in intensive food animal production,” Anim Heal. Res Rev, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. V. M. Manyong, I. Okike, and T. O. Williams, “Effective dimensionality and factors affecting crop-livestock integration in West African savannas: A combination of principal component analysis and Tobit approaches,” Agric. Econ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. J. Staal, I. Baltenweck, M. M. Waithaka, T. deWolff, and L. Njoroge, “Location and uptake: integrated household and GIS analysis of\ntechnology adoption and land use, with application to smallholder\ndairy farms in Kenya,” Agric. Econ., vol. 27, pp. 295–315, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.