Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 38, 2018
2018 4th International Conference on Energy Materials and Environment Engineering (ICEMEE 2018)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 9
Section Environmental Science and Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183801009
Published online 04 June 2018
  1. Dixon A, Simon M, Burkitt T. Assessing the environmental impact of two options for small-scale wastewater treatment: comparing a reedbed and an aerated biological filter using a life cycle approach[J]. Ecological Engineering, 20, 297-308 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Selma C. Ayaz, Özgür Aktaş, Nur Findik, et al. Phosphorus removal and effect of adsorbent type in a constructed wetland system[J]. Desalination & Water Treatment, 37, 152-159 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ceng Lingfang. A brief comment on new methods of rural domestic sewage treatment in foreign countries[J]. China Rural Nater and Hydropower, 9, 30-31 (2001). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ham J H, Yoon C G, Jeon J H, et al. Feasibility of a constructed wetland and wastewater stabilisation pond system as a sewage reclamation system for agricultural reuse in a decentralised rural area[J]. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 55, 503 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ye Yaling, Lu Mengjiang.Downflow anaerobic biofilter combined with constructed wetland to treat domestic sewage in small towns[J]. Environmental Research and Monitoring, 1, 43-45 (2004). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Suo Yanli, Pan Jing, Chen Yongqiang.Research on decentralized domestic sewage treatment by combined biological and ecological system[J]. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition, 25, 376-380 (2007). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu Caibin, Xiang Sulin, Lu Xiuguo.Combined technology of biological contact oxidization and constructed wetland for processing rural domestic sewage[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 47, 44-46 (2008). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Qiu Zhi, Hu Zhifeng, Kong Lingwei, Zhang Chi.Research on engineering application of laminated ecological filter bed in the treatment of domestic sewage[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 36, 43-45 (2014). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Kong L.W., He F., Xia S.B., et al. Research on the application of the modified aquatic mat pond and integrated vertical-flow construction wetland coupling process based on luffa sponge for micro-polluted water treatment[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 76, 155-165 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L. Multistage hybrid constructed wetland for enhanced removal of nitrogen[J]. Ecological Engineering, 84, 202-208 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wan Jiajing, Wan Zhan, Li Jun, et al. Function of the Substracts in the constructed wetlands[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 35, 16-19 (2009). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Travis M J, Weisbrod N, Gross A. Decentralized wetland-based treatment of oil-rich farm wastewater for reuse in an arid environment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 39, 81-89 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S.Ç. Ayaz, Ö. Aktaş, N. Fındık, et al. Effect of recirculation on nitrogen removal in a hybrid constructed wetland system[J]. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 40, 1-5 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Foladori P, Ortigara A R, Ruaben J, et al. Influence of high organic loads during the summer period on the performance of hybrid constructed wetlands (VSSF + HSSF) treating domestic wastewater in the Alps region[J]. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 65, 890 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zapater-Pereyra M, Ilyas H, Lavrnic, S, et al. Evaluation of the performance and space requirement by three different hybrid constructed wetlands in a stack arrangement[J]. Ecological Engineering, 82, 290-300 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang X, Inoue T, Kato K, et al. Performance of hybrid subsurface constructed wetland system for piggery wastewater treatment[J]. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 73, 13 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang D Q, Gersberg R M, Tansoon K. Constructed wetlands in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 35, 1367-1378 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jamieson T S, Stratton G W. The use of aeration to enhance ammonia nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands[J]. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 45, 9-14 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. Chung A K C, Wu Y, Tam N F Y. Nitrogen and phosphate mass balance in a sub-surface flow constructed wetland for treating municipal wastewater[J]. Ecological constructed wetland for treating municipal wastewater[J]. Ecological Engineering, 32, 81-89 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen Heping, Zhang Chen, Zhu Heping, et al. Treatment of rural domestic wastewater by anaerobic-contact oxidation and vertical flow man-made wetland[J]. Journal of Ningbo University (Natural Science & Engineering Edition), 21, 568-570 (2008). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Shentan, Wang Guofang, Xie Xiangfeng, et al. Effect of matrix on denitrification efficiency and distribution of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in constructed wetlands[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 41, 400-405 (2011). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic[J]. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 7, 1-14 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  23. Ban M. Comparison of the treatment performances of blast furnace slag-based and gravel-based vertical flow wetlands operated identically for domestic wastewater treatment in Turkey[J]. Ecological Engineering, 24, 185-198 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu Defu, Xu Jianming, Li Yingxue.The Microbial Activity of the Substrates in Constructed Wetland and Its Effect on the Removal of Nitrogen from Wastewater[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 27, 753-757 (2008). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Gu Yonggang, Jin Pengkang, Li Zhaoxin, et al. Effect of different substrates on the species formation in the water bodies supplemented by reclaimed water[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 39, 1122-1126 (2017). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Kong Lingwei, He Feng, Xia Shibin, et al. Studies on construction and performance of the Qiantang River water diversion de-nitrification demonstration project[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 36, 60-66 (2014). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Shen Z, Zhou Y, Hu J, et al. Denitrification performance and microbial diversity in a packed-bed bioreactor using biodegradable polymer as carbon source and biofilm support[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 8, 250-251 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Kong Lingwei, He Feng, Xia Shibin, et al. Studies on construction and performance of the Qiantang River water diversion de-nitrification demonstration project. Environmental Pollution & Control, 36, 60-66 (2014). (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Mæhlum, T., Stålnacke, P. Removal efficiency of three old-climate constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater: Effects of temperature, seasons, loading rates and input concentrations[J]. Water Science & Technology, 40, 273-281 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vanier S M, Dahab M F. Start-up performance of a subsurface-flow constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Technology, 22, 587-596 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vymazal J. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 25, 478-490 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.