E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
|Number of page(s)||8|
|Section||Fluid mechanics and sediment processes|
|Published online||05 September 2018|
- B.W. Melville, S.E. Coleman, Bridge Scour. Water Resources Publications, LLC, Colorado, USA (2000) [Google Scholar]
- W. Cook, P.J. Barr, M.W. Halling, Bridge failure rate. J. of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(3) (2013) [Google Scholar]
- E.M. Laursen, A. Toch, Scour around bridge piers and abutments, 4, Iowa Highway Research Board, Ames, IA, USA (1956) [Google Scholar]
- Y.W. Chang, G. Constantinescu, S. Miyawaki, W.F. Tsai, H.C. Lien, The flow and turbulence structure at a rectangular bridge pier with a low angle of attack. Proceedings of River Flow 2010, 681-689, Germany (2010) [Google Scholar]
- E.V. Richardson, S.R. Davis, Evaluating scour at bridges. 3rd edition, FHWA IP 90-017, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18, National Highway Institute, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (1995) [Google Scholar]
- R. Ettema, G. Constantinescu, B.W. Melville, Flow-Field Complexity and Design Estimation of Pier-Scour Depth: Sixty Years since Laursen and Toch, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 143(9) (2017) [Google Scholar]
- G. Oliveto, W.H. Hager, Temporal evolution of clear-water pier and abutment scour, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 128(9), 811-820 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Berger, B.W. McArdell, B. Fritschi, F. Schlunegger, A novel method for measuring the timing of bed erosion during debris flows and floods, Water Resour. Res., 46, W02502 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. F. Mia, H. Nago, Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 129(6), 420-427 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.-Y. Lu, Z.-Z. Shi, J.-H. Hong, J.-J. Lee, R.V. Raikar, Temporal variation of scour depth at nonuniform cylindrical piers, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 137(1), 45-56 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Diab, Experimental Investigation on scouring around piers of different shape and alignment in gravel, PhD thesis, Darmstadt (2011) [Google Scholar]
- F. Ballio, A. Radice, A non-touch sensor for local scour measurements, J. Hydraul. Res., 41(1), 105-108 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Link, F. Pfleger, U. Zanke, Characteristics of developing scour-holes at a sand-embedded cylinder, Int. J. Sediment Res., 23(3), 258-266 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Pfleger, C. Rapp, M. Manhart, Experimental investigation on the sediment movement in the vicinity of a cylindrical bridge pier, River Flow 2014, 1701-1708 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- P.X. Ramos, A.M. Bento, R. Maia, J.P. Pêgo, Characterization of the scour cavity evolution around a complex bridge pier. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 4(2), 128-137 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Lachat, H. Macher, M.-A- Mittet, T. Landes, P. Grussenmeyer, First experiences with kinect V2 sensor for close range 3D modelling. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 40(5W4), 93-100 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Amaral, Experimental characterization of the failure by overtopping of embankment dams, PhD thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal (2017) [Google Scholar]
- S.O. Lee, T.W. Sturm, Effect of sediment size scaling on physical modelling of bridge pier scour. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 135(10), 793-802 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y.M. Chiew, B.W. Melville, Local scour around bridge piers, J. Hydraul. Res., ASCE, 25(1), 15-26 (1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.R. Neil, Mean velocity criterion for scour of coarse uniform bed material. Proceedings of XII IAHR Congress, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (1967) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.