Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
Article Number 06006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Extreme events
Published online 05 September 2018
  1. World Resources Institute. ACT 2015 Publications. 2015 [cited 2016 27 January]; Available from: [Google Scholar]
  2. An, H. and S. Yu, Well-balanced shallow water flow simulation on quadtree cut cell grids. Advances in Water Resources, 2012. 39: p. 60-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer, D.R. and H.J. Fowler, Characterising flash flood response to intense rainfall and impacts using historical information and gauged data in Britain. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2015: p. n/a-n/a. [Google Scholar]
  4. Werner, M. and M. Cranston, Understanding the Value of Radar Rainfall Nowcasts in Flood Forecasting and Warning in Flashy Catchments. Meteorological Applications, 2009. 16(1): p. 41-55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Defra; Environment Agency, Understanding of and response to severe flash flooding 2009: Bristol. [Google Scholar]
  6. Corps of Engineers, Flood Resulting from suddenly breached dams. 1960: Mississippi. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stansby, P.K., A. Chegini, and T.C.D. Barnes, The initial stages of dam-break flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998. 374: p. 407-424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peng, S.H. and S.C. Chen, Comparison of numerical and experimental study of dambreak induced mudflow. Sediment Dynamics and the Hydromorphology of Fluvial Systems, 2006. 306: p. 548-555. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhainakov, A.Z. and A.Y. Kurbanaliev, Verification of the open package OpenFOAM on dam break problems. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2013. 20(4): p. 451-461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marsooli, R. and W. Wu, 3-D finite-volume model of dam-break flow over uneven beds based on VOF method. Advances in Water Resources, 2014. 70: p. 104-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Aureli, F., et al., Experimental and numerical evaluation of the force due to the impact of a dam-break wave on a structure. Advances in Water Resources, 2015. 76: p. 29-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Defra and Environment Agency, Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages, in Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme. 2010: Bristol. [Google Scholar]
  13. Testa, G., et al., Flash flood flow experiment in a simplified urban district. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2007. 45(Extra issue): p. 37-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Braud, I., et al., The use of distributed hydrological models for the Gard 2002 flash flood event: Analysis of associated hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology, 2010. 394(1-2): p. 162-181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, W., et al., Full 2D hydrodynamic modelling of rainfall-induced flash floods. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015. 12(5): p. 1203-1218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vischer, D. and W.H. Hager, Dam hydraulics. 1998: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lauber, G. and W.H. Hager, Experiments to dambreak wave: Horizontal channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1998. 36(3): p. 291-307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ritter, A., Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Vereine Deutcher Ingenieure Zeitswchrift, 1892. 36: p. 947-954. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chanson, H., Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow. Second ed. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  20. Damián, S.M., Description and utilization of interFoam multiphase solver. 2012, International Center for Computational Methods in Engineering. [Google Scholar]
  21. Furbo, E., Evaluation of RANS turbulence models for flow problems with significant impact of boundary layers 2010, Uppsala Universitet. p. 56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenshields, C.J., OpenFOAM:The Open Source CFD Toolbox, User Guide. 2015. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.