Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
Article Number 06028
Number of page(s) 8
Section Extreme events
Published online 05 September 2018
  1. Fiori, E., Comellas, A., Molini, L., Rebora, N., Siccardi, F., Gochis, D.J., Tanelli, S., Parodi, A., 2014. Analysis and hindcast simulations of an extreme rainfall event in the Mediterranean area: the Genoa 2011 case. Atmos. Res. 138, 13-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Leoncini, G., Plant, R.S., Gray, S.L., Clark, P.A., 2013. Ensemble forecasts of a floodproducing storm: comparison of the influence of model-state perturbations and parameter modifications. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 139 (670), 198-211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Addor, N., Jaun, S., Fundel, F., Zappa, M., 2011. An operational hydrological ensemble prediction system for the city of Zurich (Switzerland): skill, case studies and scenarios. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 2327-2347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amengual, A., Romero, R., Alonso, S., 2008. Hydrometeorological ensemble simulations of flood events over a small basin of Majorca Island, Spain. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 134, 1221-1242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vincendon, B., Ducrocq, V., Nuissier, O., Vié, B., 2011. Perturbation of convectionpermitting NWP forecasts for flash-flood ensemble forecasting. Nat. Haz. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 1529-1544 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cea, L., and Bladé, E., 2015. A simple and efficient unstructured finite volume scheme for solving the shallow water equations in overland flow applications. Water Resources Research, 51, 5464-5486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernández-Pato, J., Caviedes-Voullième, D., and García-Navarro, P., 2016. Rainfall/runoff simulation with 2D full shallow water equations: Sensitivity analysis and calibration of infiltration parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 536, 496-513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Özgen, I., Zhao, J., Liang, D., and Hinkelmann, R., 2016. Urban flood modeling using shallow water equations with depth-dependent anisotropic porosity. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 1165-1184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu, C., and Duan, J. 2017. Simulation of Surface Runoff Using Hydrodynamic Model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 22(6), 4017006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Skamarock, W.C., et al., 2008. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-4751STR, 125 p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisman, M. L., S. W. C. and Klemp, J. B., 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Monthly Weather Review, 125, 527-548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts, N. and Lean, H., 2008. Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Monthly Weather Review, 136, 78-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zheng, Y., Alapaty, K., Herwehe, J. A., Del Genio, A. D., and Niyogi, D., 2016. Improving High-Resolution Weather Forecasts Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model with an Updated Kain-Fritsch Scheme. Monthly Weather Review, 144, 833-860. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hong, S. and Lim, J., 2006. The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6). Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 42.2 (2006.4): 129-151. [Google Scholar]
  15. Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mlawer, E.J., Taubman, S.J., Brown, P.D., Iacono, M.J., Clough, S.A., 1997. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 16663-16682. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dudhia, J., 1989. Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 3077-3107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tewari, M., Chen, F., Wang, W., Dudhia, J., LeMone, M.A., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Gayno, G., Wegiel, J., Cuenca, R.H., 2004. Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model. In: 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 11-15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Blade2iversitat Politècnica de Catalunya), 30(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  20. LeVeque, R. L., 2002. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematic, 31. [Google Scholar]
  21. Toro, E. F., 2009. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Roe, P., 1986. A basis for the upwind differencing of the two-dimensional unsteady Euler equations. Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics II, K. W. Morton and M. J. Baines, eds., 59-80. [Google Scholar]
  23. ACA, 2007. Planificació de l'Espai Fluvial. Estudis d'inundabilitat en l'àmbit del projecte PEFCAT-Memòria específica Conca de La Muga. Agència Catalana de l'Aigua. Generalitat de Catalunya. Febrer 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. EEA, 2007. CORINE Land Cover 2006 technical guidelines. European Environmental Agency Technical report No 17/2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Barnes, H. H., 1987. Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels. Technical Report, Geological Survey Water-Supply, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, U.S.A, 219. [Google Scholar]
  26. USDA, 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release 55 (TR-55) (Second ed.). Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division. 210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986. [Google Scholar]
  27. Akima, H., 1978: A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Trans. Math. Software, 4, 148-164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.