Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 44, 2018
10th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2018
Article Number 00099
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400099
Published online 03 July 2018
  1. E.M., Peña-Méndez, J. Havel, J. Patočka, Humic Journal of Applied Biomedicine 3, 13–24, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Casassas, L. Marqués, R. Tauler, Analytica Chimica Acta 310, 473–484 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Gajdošová, L. Pokorná., S. Láska, P. Prošek, J. Havel, Royal Society of Chemistry, 121–131 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  4. K.H. Tan, Chemical composition of humic matter. Humic Matter in Soil and the Environment. Principles and Controversies (Marcel and Dekker, New York, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Kurková, Z. Klika, Ch. Kliková, J. Havel Chemosphere 54, 1237–1245 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Krupińska, Inżynieria Środowiska 148, 28 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Pempkowiak, H. Obarska-Pempkowiak, M. Gajewska, D. Ruta, Przem. Chem. 87, 5, 542–54 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Osadchyy, B. Nabyvantes, P. Linnik, N. Osadcha, Y. Nabyvantes, Processes Determining Surface Water Chemistry, 104 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Baidoo, J. Ephraim, G. Darko, O. Akoto, Geoderma 217–218, 18–25 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Trellu, Y. Péchaud, N. Oturan, E. Mousset, D. Hugeuenot, E. Hullebusch, G. Esposito, M. Oturan, Applied Catalysis B: Environment 194, 32–41 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Hua, D.A. Reckhow, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3309–3315 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. V.K. Sharma, R. Zboril, T.J. McDonald, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 49, 3, 212–28 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. H.K. Shon, S. Vigneswaran, J. Kandasamy, J. Cho, Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies, 1 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Świderska, A.M. Anielak, Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska 6, 1–49 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Matilainen, M. Vepsalainen, M. Sillanpaa, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 159, 189–197 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. G.R. Aiken, E.M. Thurman, R.L. Malcolm, H.F. Walton, Anal. Chim. Acta 51, 1799–1803 (1979) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A.M. Anielak, M. Polus, D. Łomińska, T. Żaba, Przemysł Chemiczny 95, 1, 110–113 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Łomińska, A. Anielak, ES3 Web of Conferences 17, 00054 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A.M. Anielak, M. Kryłów, D. Łomińska-Płatek, Archives of Environmental Protection 44, 1, 69–75 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Ma, H.E. Allen, Y. Yin, Wat. Res. 35, 4, 985–996 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Grzegorczuk-Nowacka, Adsorption of fulvic acids from aqueous solutions (Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Becher, D. Kalembasa, K. Pakuła, E. Malinowska, Agricultura 12, 4, 7–13 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Boguta, V. D’Orazio, Z. Sokołowska, N. Sensei, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 168, 119–126 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.