Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 44, 2018
10th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2018
Article Number 00106
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400106
Published online 03 July 2018
  1. R. Adams, D. Simmons, Ecological Effects of Fire Fighting Foams and Retardants. Australian Forestry, 62, p. 307-314 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Król, K. Prochalska, Ł. Chrzanowski, Biodegradability of Firefighting Foams. Fire Technology, 48, p. 173-181 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C.R. Stoof, J.G. Wesseling, C.J. Ritesma, Effects of fire and ash on soil water retention. Geoderma, 159, p. 276-285 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ł. Kuziora, J. Kalinko, M. Łapicz, Wody pogaśnicze – potencjalne zagrożenie podczas długotrwałych działań gaśniczych.. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP, 64, p. 53-65. [Google Scholar]
  5. B.A. Begum, E. Kim, C.H. Jeong, D.W Lee, P.K. Hopke, Evaluation of the potential source contribution function using the 2002 Quebec forest fire episode. Atmospheric Environment, 39: p. 3719-3724 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Zhang, A. Hecobian, M. Zheng, N.H. Frank, R.J. Weber, Biomass burning impact on PM2.5 over the southeastern US during 2007: integrating chemically speciated FRM filter measurements, MODIS fire counts and PMF analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, p. 6839-6853 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Reisen, C.P. Meyer, M.D. Keywood, Impact of biomass burning sources on seasonal aerosol air quality. Atmos Environ., 67, p. 437-447 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Sapkota, et al., Impact of the 2002 Canadian forest fires on particulate matter air quality in Baltimore city. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, p. 24-32 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Jaffe, et al., Interannual Variations in PM2.5 due to Wildfires in the Western United States. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, p. 2812-2818 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. T.J Ward, G.C Smith, The 2000/2001 Missoula Valley PM2.5 chemical mass balance study, including the 2000 wildfire season—seasonal source apportionment. Atmospheric Environment, 39, p. 709-717 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L.P. Naeher, et al., Woodsmoke Health Effects: A Review. Inhalation Toxicology, 19, p. 67-106 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. E.R. Sutherland, et al., Wildfire smoke and respiratory symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol, 115, p. 420-422 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. F.H. Johnston, et al., Extreme air pollution events from bushfires and dust storms and their association with mortality in Sydney, Australia 1994–2007. Environ. Res., 111, p. 811-816 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. R.J Delfino, et al., The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of 2003. Occup. Environ. Med., 66, p. 189-197 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Haikerwal, et al., Impact of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Exposure During Wildfires on Cardiovascular Health Outcomes. Journal of the American Heart Association, 4 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Evans, V. Babrauskas, The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Enggineering, SFPE/NFPA 1995, NFPA, Quincy MA (USA). [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Jarosz, Z. Salamonowicz, M. Majder-Łopatka, R. Matuszkiewicz, A. Dmochowska, Zagrożenia środowiska naturalnego powodowane przez produkty spalania ropy naftowej. Przemysł Chemiczny, 93, p. 686-691 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. M.P. Thompson, et al., A review of challenges to determining and demonstrating efficiency of large fire management. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 26, p. 562-573 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.