EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 (2018) E3S Web Conf., 45 (2018) 00061 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 45, 2018
VI International Conference of Science and Technology INFRAEKO 2018 Modern Cities. Infrastructure and Environment
Article Number 00061
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184500061
Published online 30 July 2018
  1. ‘ISO 29481-1:2016 -Building information models--Information delivery manual--Part 1: Methodology and format'. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/60553.html. [Accessed: 25-Apr-2018] [Google Scholar]
  2. ‘ISO 29481-2:2012 -Building information models--Information delivery manual--Part 2: Interaction framework'. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/55691.html. [Accessed: 25-Apr-2018] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. See, J. Karlshoej, and D. Davis, 'An Integrated Process for Delivering IFC Based Data Exchange'. buildingSMART (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Messner, C. Anumba, C. Dubler, S. Goodman, C. Kasprzak, and R. Kreider, 'BIM Project Execution Planning Guide'. The Computer Integrated Construction Research Program (CIC), Penn State University (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Amann, A. Borrmann, T. Chipman, E. Lebegue, T. Liebich, and P. Scarponcini, 'IFC Alignment Project, Process Map and Use Cases'. BuildingSMART (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Lee, Y. H. Park, and S. Ham, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27(4), 636-651, Oct. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. ‘PAS 1192-2:2013; Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling'. British Standards Institution (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. Á. Gigante-Barrera, D. Ruikar, M. Crunden, and K. Ruikar, J. Inf. Technol. Constr. ITcon, 22(5), 80-103, May (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. O. B. Berard and J. Karlshøj, J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 17, 77-87 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Steel, R. Drogemuller, and B. Toth, Softw. Syst. Model. 11(1), 99-109, Feb. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giel Brittany and Issa Raja R. A., J. Manag. Eng. 32(1), p. 04015024, Jan. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Rizal and L. van Berlo, Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 6(4), 254-263, Jan. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Succar, W. Sher, and A. Williams, Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 8, 120-142, Mar. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. L. G. Dietz, Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Hjelseth, Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 6(4), 279-287 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. White and S. Cicmil, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 6, 302-323, Mar. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J.-H. Woo, M. J. Clayton, R. E. Johnson, B. E. Flores, and C. Ellis, Autom. Constr. 13(2), 203-207, Mar. (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Erich, R. Helm, R. Jahnson, and J. Vlissides, Inżynieria oprogrmowania. Wzorce projektowe. [Software engineering. Project patterns.], II. Warsaw: WNT, (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.