Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 47, 2018
2nd Scientific Communication in Fisheries and Marine Sciences (SCiFiMaS 2018)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Biodiversity and Bioprospecting for Tropical Species
Published online 01 August 2018
  1. Andriyani, N; US Siregar; and A. Mahdiana. 2013. The types of algae blooming in the reservoir potential Yag Mrica-Banjarnegara. Paper presented at the National Seminar on “Rural Resource Development and Local Wisdom sustained in LPPM Unsoed Purwokerto. 26 to 27 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Edmondson, WT 1959. Freshwater Biology. John Willey and Sons Inc. New York. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mizuno, T. 1978. Illustration of The Fresh Water Plankton. Japan: Heikusha Publishing, co. Ltd Osaka. [Google Scholar]
  4. Odum, E.P. 1988. Fundamental of Ecology. Phidelphia: W.B. Sounders Company. [Google Scholar]
  5. Soylu, E.N., and A. Gönülol. 2003. Phytoplankton and seasonal variations of the River Ye ili{dotless}rmak Amasya Turkey Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic ciences: 17-24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stoddard, A., J.B. Harcum, J.T. Simpson, J.R. Pagenk opf, and R.K. Bastian. 2003, Municipal Wastewater Treatment: Evaluating Improvements in National Water Quality. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oren, A. 2011. Naming Cyanophyta / Cyanobacteria-A Bacteriologist’s View. Fottea. 11 (1): 9-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barange, M and B. Campos. 1991. Model of spesies abundance: a critique of and an alternative to the dynamic model. Marine Ecology Progress Series 69: 293-298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapman, VJ and DJ Chapman. 1973. Algae Freshwater EcologyThe 2nd Edition. The Mac Millan Press, London [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutabarat, S. 2000. Marine Productivity and Plankton. Publisher Agency Dipenogoro University, Semarang. [Google Scholar]
  11. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zalocar de Domitrovic, Z.Y., A.S.G. Poi de Neiff, and S.L. Casco. 2007. Abundance and diversity of phytoplankton in the Paraná River (Argentina) 220 km downstream of the Yacyretá reservoir. Brazil [Google Scholar]
  13. APHA (American Public Health Association). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 21th edition. Washington DC [Google Scholar]
  14. Onyema, I.C. 2007. The phytoplankton composition, abundance and temporal variation of a polluted estuarine creek in Lagos, Nigeria, Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 7: 89-96. [Google Scholar]
  15. Piirsoo, K., P. Peeter, A Tuvikene, and V. Malle. 2008. Temporal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton in a temperate lowland river (Emajo&tild;gi, Estonia). Journal of Plankton Research 30 (11): 1285-1295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bledsoe, E., E.J. Phlips, C.E. Jett, and K.A. Donnelly. 2004. The relationships among phytoplankton biomass, nutrient loading and hydrodinamics in an inner shelf estuary. Ophelia 58 (1):20-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lacerda, S R., M.L. Koening, S. Neum ann-Leitão, and M.J. Flores-Montes. 2004. Phytoplankton Nyctemeral variation at a tropical river estuary (Itamaracá-Pernambuco-Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Biology 64 (1): 81-94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tuvikene, A., K. Piirsoo, and Pall. 2005. Effect of nutrient load on the planktonic biota in the River Narva drainage area. In Russo, R. C. (ed.), 2005. Modelling Nutrient Loads and Responses in River and Estuary Systems. Report No. 271. Brussels: Committee on the Challenges at Modern Society, NATO. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekwu, A.O. and F.D. Sikoki. 2006. Phytoplankton diversity in the cross river estuary of Nigeria, Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management 10 (1): 89-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.