Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 52, 2018
CSSPO International Conference 2018: Towards Inclusive & Sustainable Agriculture – Harmonizing Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions: Is it Possible?
Article Number 00018
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200018
Published online 27 August 2018
  1. C.P. Soni, Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Adat Dayak Kanayaitn dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat (Marang) di Kampung Sidas Data Kecamatan Sengah Temila Kabupaten Landak Kalimantan Barat [skripsi]. DIY (ID): Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. E.B. Walujo, Keterintegrasian Ilmu Sosial dengan Ilmu-ilmu Lain di Indonesia. Bunga Rampai Metodologi Penelitian. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi, Direktorat Pembinaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat. 173-176 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  3. Direktorat Jendral Perkebunan. (2016). Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia: komoditas kelapa sawit 2013-2015. Jakarta(ID): Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Kementerian Pertanian. [Google Scholar]
  4. Budidarsono et al, Oil palm plantation in Indonesia: the implications for migration. settlement/resettlement and local economics development, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. L.A. Budiasih, Inventerisasi Jenis Tumbuhan yang Berkhasiat sebagai Obat di kawasan Hutan Baning Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Skripsi, Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Tanjung Pura Pontianak, (2005), [Google Scholar]
  6. L.P. Koh, D.S. Wilcove, Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448: 993-994, (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Zakaria, C. Theile, L. Khaimur, Policy, practice, pride and prejudice: review of legal, environmental and social practices of oil palm plantation companies of the Wilmar Group in Sambas District, West Kalimantan (Indonesia). Friends of the Earth Netherlands, Lembaga Gemawan, and KONTAK Rakyat Borneo, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Azhar, L.P. Chong, M. Zakaria, N. Hassan, M. Arif, Effects of monoculture and polyculture practices in oil palm smallholdings on tropical farmland birds. Basic and Applied Ecology 15:336-346, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Obidzinski, R. Andriani, H. Komarudin, A. Andrianto, Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society 17(1): 25, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E.B. Fitzherbert, M.J Struebig, A. Morel, How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 538-545 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. L.P. Koh, D.S. Wilcove, Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity. Conservation Letters 1:60-64, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Santosa, A. Sunkar, Erniwati, I. Purnamasari, Sejarah Perkembangan Status, Penggunaan Lahan, dan Keanekaragaman Hayati Kebun Sawit Indonesia [laporan riset]. Bogor (ID): Badan Pengelola Dana Perkebunan Sawit dan Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat IPB, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Kecamatan Nanga Tayap dalam Angka 2017. Ketapang (ID): BPS Kabupaten Ketapang. [Google Scholar]
  14. Darmadi. Dayak asal-usul dan penyebarannya di Bumi Borneo (1). Vol.3, No. 2. (Sosial Horizon, Pontianak, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. A Afandi, Perbandingan Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Hutan Rakyat Berbasis Karet Dan Kebun Kelapa Sawit [skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Fauzi, Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan : Teori dan Aplikasi. (Gramedia, Jakarta, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Sunkar, Y. Santosa, S.H Hasibuan. Identifikasi Peubah Sosial Ekonomi Penentu Keberhasilan Konservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati, Media Konservasi, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. S.B. Brush, A non-market approach to proctecting biological research. In: Greaves, T. (editor). (Intelectual Property Right for Indigenous People. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied Anthropology, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Kaplan and R.A. Manners, Teori Budaya (terjemahan) Landung Simatupang. Pustaka Pelajar. Edisi III. 294 hal, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  20. E.B. Walujo, Sumbangan Ilmu Etnobotani dalam Memfasilitasi Hubungan Manusia dengan Tumbuhan dan Lingkungannya, Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 7 (2): 375-391 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Sunkar, E. Amzu, S. Nurjannah. Peran Kawasan Bernilai Konservasi Tinggi Bagi Pelestarian Keanekaragaman Hayati di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Provinsi Riau, Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Lovadi, R. Linda, Meliki. Etnobotani Tumbuhan Obat oleh Suku Dayak Iban di Desa Tanjung Sari Kecamatan Ketungau Tengah Kabupaten Sintang, Protobiont Vol 2 (3): 129-135, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. E.B. Waluyo, Perkembangan pemanfaatan tumbuhan obat di luar Pulau Jawa. Prosiding Pemanfaatan Tentang Tumbuhan Obat dari Hutan Tropika Indonesia, (Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 1991) [Google Scholar]
  24. E.B. Walujo, Etnobotani: Memfasilitasi penghayatan, pemutakiran pengetahuan dan kearifan lokal dengan mengguna-kan prinsipprinsip dasar ilmu pengetahuan. Prosiding Seminar Enobotani IV. (Cibinong Science Center-LIPI, 18 Mei 2009, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Purwanto, T. chikmawati, D. Setiadi, J. Batoro, Pengetahuan Tentang Tumbuhan Masyarakat Tengger di Bromo Tengger Semeru Jawa Timur, WACANA Jurnal Sosial, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  26. Danoesatro, Tumbuhan Obat Keluarga, (Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta, 1980) [Google Scholar]
  27. W. Giono, Budidaya Tumbuhan Obat di Perkarangan, (Agromedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2004) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.