Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 52, 2018
CSSPO International Conference 2018: Towards Inclusive & Sustainable Agriculture – Harmonizing Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions: Is it Possible?
Article Number 00032
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 27 August 2018
  1. N. Qamar, Perbandingan sistem hukum dan peradilan: Civil law system dan common law system, p. 3-4 (Refleksi, Makassar, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. S. E. Merry, Legal pluralism, Law Soc. Rev. 22: 869-896 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Irianto, Sejarah dan perkembangan pemikiran pluralisme hukum dan konsekuensi metodologisnya, Wacana Antropologi 1 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Nasution, Hukum perlindungan konsumen: Suatu pengantar, p. 21-22 (Diadit Media, Jakarta, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Menski, Perbandingan hukum dalam konteks global: Sistem Eropa, Asia dan Afrika, Translated by M. Khozim, p. 228-242 (Nusamedia, Bandung, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  6. Amiruddin and Z. Asikin, Pengantar metode penelitian hukum, p. 118 (Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Soekanto and S. Mamuji, Penelitian hukum normatif, p. 10 (Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. Soeroso, Perbandingan hukum perdata, p. 6 (Grafika, Jakarta, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Turkel, Law and Society Critical Approachs, p. 10 (Allyn and Bacon, USA, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. Ali, Menguak teori hukum dan teori peradilan, p. 159 (Kencana, Jakarta, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Sidabalok, Hukum perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia, p. 23-24 (Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. Sudaryatmo, Memahami hak anda sebagai konsumen, 1st Edition, p. 23 (PIRAC, Jakarta, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. B. Carroll, Busines and society, in K. Bertens, Pengantar etika bisnis, p. 248 (Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. Putusan PN Tangerang No. 30/Pid.B/1990/PN/Tng [Google Scholar]
  15. Putusan PN Jakarta Pusat No. 3138/K/Pdt/1994/PN.Jkt.Pst. Putusan Kasasi MA No. 3138/K/Pdt/1994. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. M. Hass, Introduction: eepistemic communities and international policy coordination, Int. Organ., special issue: Knowledge, power, and international policy coordination, Cambridge Journals, 46:1; 1-35 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Nasution, Sekilas hukum perlindungan konsumen, Majalah hukum dan pembangunan, Tahun XVI, 6, 70 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  18. Watson, Comparative law and legal change, Lecture at King’s College on 6 February 1978, and the author wishes to dedicate it to Otto Kahn-Freund. [Google Scholar]
  19. N. S. Imaniati, Perlindungan konsumen salah satu upaya penegakan etika bisnis pada masyarakat islam dalam era globalisasi, Jurnal Mimbar, 4 Th.XVII (2001) [Google Scholar]
  20. L. L. Fuller, The morality of law, 2nd ed., chap. 2. (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1969) [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Johnston, Roman law in context, p. 6 (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. Pejovic, Civil law and common law: two different paths leading to the same goal, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 32;817-842 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Dainow, The civil law and the common law: some points of comparison, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 15:3; 419-435 (1966) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.