EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 65 (2018) E3S Web Conf., 65 (2018) 05026 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 65, 2018
International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE 2018)
Article Number 05026
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186505026
Published online 26 November 2018
  1. Davis, A.P., et al., Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009. 135(3): p. 109-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Laurenson, G., et al., The role of bioretention systems in the treatment of stormwater, in Advances in agronomy. 2013, Elsevier. p. 223-274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Joshi, U. and R. Balasubramanian, Characteristics and environmental mobility of trace elements in urban runoff. Chemosphere, 2010. 80(3): p. 310-318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis, A.P., et al., Water quality improvement through bioretention media: Nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Environment Research, 2006. 78(3): p. 284-293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dietz, M.E., Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, air, and soil pollution, 2007. 186(1-4): p. 351-363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, A.P., et al., Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environment Research, 2001: p. 5-14. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lim, H.S., et al., Comparison of filter media materials for heavy metal removal from urban stormwater runoff using biofiltration systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015. 147: p. 24-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Muha, N.E. and L.M. Sidek, Bio-retention system as storm water quality improvement mechanism. Sci Res J, 2015. 3(2): p. 39-46. [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Coustumer, S., et al., The influence of design parameters on clogging of stormwater biofilters: A large-scale column study. Water Research, 2012. 46(20): p. 6743-6752. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MSMA, Manual Saliran Mesra Alam. 2012, Department of Irrigation and Drainage: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  11. Payne, E., et al., Adoption guidelines for stormwater biofiltration systems-Summary report. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Duncan, H., Urban stormwater quality: a statistical overview. 1999: CRC for Catchment Hydrology. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yusop, Z., et al., Runoff quality and pollution loadings from a tropical urban catchment. Water Science & Technology, 2005. 52(9): p. 125-132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. DOE, Malaysia Environmental Quality Report. 2006, Department of Environment: Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  15. ASTM D2434-68, Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head). 2006, ASTM International: West Conshohocken. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Z., et al., Air entrapment effects on infiltration rate and flow instability. Water Resources Research, 1998. 34(2): p. 213-222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. FAWB, Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems, Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration. Vol. version 1. 2009, Monash University. [Google Scholar]
  18. Devitt, D.A. and S.D. Smith, Root channel macropores enhance downward movement of water in a Mojave Desert ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments, 2002. 50(1): p. 99-108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hatt, B.E., T.D. Fletcher, and A. Deletic, Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environmental science & technology, 2008. 42(7): p. 2535-2541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Henderson, C., M. Greenway, and I. Phillips, Removal of dissolved nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon from stormwater by biofiltration mesocosms. Water Science & Technology, 2007. 55(4): p. 183-191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bratieres, K., et al., Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: A large-scale design optimization study. Water Research, 2008. 42(14): p. 3930-3940. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Read, J., et al., Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Research, 2008. 42(4-5): p. 893-902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ozawa, M., et al., Effects of surface soil removal on dynamics of dissolved inorganic nitrogen in a snow-dominated forest. The Scientific World Journal, 2001. 1: p. 527-533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Clarkson, D.T., The uptake and translocation of manganese by plant roots, in Manganese in soils and plants. 1988, Springer. p. 101-111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sousa, F.W., et al., Green coconut shells applied as adsorbent for removal of toxic metal ions using fixed-bed column technology. Journal of environmental management, 2010. 91(8): p. 1634-1640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, J., et al., First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 2002. 293(1): p. 163-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.