EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 65 (2018) E3S Web Conf., 65 (2018) 07005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 65, 2018
International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE 2018)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 13
Section Hydrology & Hydraulics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186507005
Published online 26 November 2018
  1. E.A. Baltas, N.A. Dervos, M.A. Mimikou, HESS, 11, 1825-1829 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Banasik, D. Woodward, Empirical Determination of Runoff Curve Number for a Small Agricultural Watershed in Poland, 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 10 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Banasik, Predicting the Flood Hydrographs for Small Urban Watersheds (in Polish), Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press, Warsaw (2009) [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Canters, J. Chormanski, T. Van de Voorde, O. Batelaan, Effects of Different Methods for Estimating Impervious Surface cover on Runoff Estimation at Catchment Level. In Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal, 557-566 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. C.H. Chan, Modelling Watershed Cumulative Effects On Runoff Based On Major Land Uses, MS Thesis (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. R.G. Cronshey, R.T. Roberts, N. Miller, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR-55 Rev.), Hydraulics and Hydrology in the Small Computer Age: Proceedings of the Specialty Conference,(1985) [Google Scholar]
  7. D.R. Cox, Principles of Statistical Inference (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. D’Asaro, G. Grillone, R.H. Hawkins, J.Hydrol.Eng, 17, 1141-1152 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. D’Asaro, G. Grillone, R.H. Hawkins, J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 04014035-1-13 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A.C. Davison, D.V. Hinkley, Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (1997) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1994) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Efron, Large-Scale Inference: Empirical Bayes Methods for Estimation, Testing, and Prediction (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Elhakeem, A. N. Papanicolaou, Water Resour Manag, 23, 2455-2473 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Fan, Y. Deng, X. Hu, Q. Weng, Remote Sens., 5, 1425-1438 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Gajbhiye, S.K. Mishra, Application of NRSC-SCS curve number model in runoff estimation using RS and GIS. In: IEEE-ICAESM, 346-352 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  16. R. H. Hawkins, A Comparison of Predicted and Observed Runoff Curve Numbers, Water today and tomorrow, Symp. Proc., ASCE, Reston, VA, 702-709 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. H. Hawkins, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 119, 334-345 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  18. R.H. Hawkins, A.V. Khojeini, Initial Abstraction and Loss in the Curve Number Method, Arizona State Hydrological Society Proceedings, 115-119 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. R.H. Hawkins, T.J. Ward, D.E. Woodward, J.A. Van Mullem, Curve Number Hydrology: State of Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 106 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  20. R.H. Hawkins, Local Sources for Runoff Curve Numbers, In Proceedings of 11th Annual Symposium of the Arizona Hydrological Society, 23-26 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  21. R.H. Hawkins, T. J. Ward, Site and Cover Effects on Event Runoff, Jornada Experimental Range, New Mexico. In Proceddings: American Water Resource Association Conference on Rangeland Management and Water Resources, 361-370 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  22. A.T. Hjelmfelt, Journal of Hydraulic Division, 106, 1471-1476 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Jiang, Investigation of Runoff Curve Number Initial Abstraction Ratio, MS Thesis (2001) [Google Scholar]
  24. N.W. Kim, J.W. Lee, J.E. Lee, SWAT Application to Estimate Design Runoff Curve Number for South Korean Condition, Hydrol.Sci, 24, 2150-2170 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Ling, Z. Yusop, A micro focus with macro impact: Exploration of initial abstraction coefficient ratio (λ) in Soil Conservation Curve Number (CN) methodology. IOP Conf. Ser: Earth Environ. Sci. 18 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Ling, Z. Yusop, Pertanika J.Sci.Technol. 25, 139-150 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Ling. Deriving The Initial Abstraction Ratio Coefficient for Runoff Prediction in Peninsula Malaysia. PhD Thesis (2017). [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Ling, Z. Yusop, ARPN JEAS, 11, 9706-9711 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. N.S. Magesh, N. Chandrasekar, J.P. Soundranayagam, Geosci. Front. 3(2), 189-196 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. S.C. McCutcheon, Rainfall-runoff relationships for selected eastern U.S. forested mountain watersheds: Testing of the curve number method for flood analysis, Technical Rep., West Virginia Division of Forestry, Charleston, WV (2006) [Google Scholar]
  31. D.N. Moriasi, J.G. Arnold, M.W. Van Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel, T.L. Veith, 50, 885-900 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  32. Majlis Perbandaran Johor Bahru Tengah (MPJBT), Rancangan Tempatan Skudai (1993-2010). Johor Bahru, Malaysia: Pihak Berkuasa Perancangan Tempatan Daerah Jahor Bahru (2001) [Google Scholar]
  33. V.M. Ponce, R.H. Hawkins, J. Hydrol. Eng., 1, 11-19 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Rutkowska, S. Kohnova, K. Banasik, J. Szolgay, B. Karabova, JMS, 12, 533-548 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Roy, S. Saha, Int. Res. J. Earth Sci., 5, 1-7 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. R.K. Sahu, S.K. Mishra, T.I. Eldho, J. Hydraul. Eng., 18, 27-36 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  37. L.E. Schneider, R.H. McCuen, J.Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131, 282-290 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A.N. Sharpley, J.R. Williams, EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Determination. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, No. 1768, 235 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  39. Z.H. Shi, L.D. Chen, N.F. Fang, D.F. Qin, C.F. Cai, Catena, 77, 1-7 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Stewart, E. Canfield, R. Hawkins, J. Hydraul. Eng., 17, 1180-1187 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  41. C.A. Spruill, S.R. Workman, J.L. Taraba, Trans of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43, 1431-1439 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4 Hydrology. (1964) [Google Scholar]
  43. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4 Hydrology. (1972) [Google Scholar]
  44. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4 Hydrology. (1985) [Google Scholar]
  45. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4 Hydrology. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  46. K.X. Soulis, J.D. Valiantzas, Water Resour, Manage, 27, 1737-1749 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. K.X. Soulis, J.D. Valiantzas, N. Dercas, P.A., HESS, 13, 605-615 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  48. N.H. Tedela, S.C. McCutcheon, J.L. Campbell, W.T. Swank, M.B. Adams, T.C. Rasmussen, J. Hydrol. Eng., 7, 1199-1203 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  49. N.H. Tedela, S.C. McCutcheon, T.C. Rasmussen, R.H. Hawkins, W.T. Swank, J.L. Campbell, M.B. Adams, J. Hydrol. Eng., 17, 1188-1198 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. D.E. Woodward, R.H. Hawkins, R. Jiang, A.T. Hjelmfelt, J.A. Van Mullem, Q.D. Quan, Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio, World Water & Environmental Resources Congress, 1-10 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  51. United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  52. G.A. Young, R.L. Smith, Essentials of Statistical Inference (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Y. Yuan, W. Nie, S.C. McCutcheon, E.V. Taguas, Hydrol Process, 28, 774-783 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. S.M. Yusuf, D. Guluda, T. Jayanegara, Surface Runoff Estimation from Various Land Use in Mapili Watershed using SCS Curve Number and Geographic Information System, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 54 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  55. X. Zhan, M.L. Huang, Environ. Modell. Softw. 19, 875-879 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. S.M. Zhou, T.W. Lei, ASC, 44, 4240-4247 (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.