Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hydrology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197602004
Published online 15 January 2019
  1. A.J. Horne, C.R. Goldman. Limnology, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 356-383 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  2. S.A. Al-shami., C. Salmah., A. Hassan., S. Abdul., S. Azizah., M. Nor. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety influence of agricultural, industrial, and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74 (5), 1195-1202. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.02.022. (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Ramirez., R. De Jesus-Crespo., D.M. Martino-Cardona., N. Martinez-Rivera., S. Burgos-Caraballo. Urban streams in Puerto Rico: what can we learn from the tropics?. The North American Benthological Society, 28 (4): 1070-1079 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. B.J.F.V. Rosa, L.F.T Rodriguez, G.S. Oliveira, R.G. Alves. Chironomidae and Oligochaeta for water quality evaluation in an urban river in southeastern Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 7771-7779 (2014) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Bonada, N. Prat, V.H. Resh, B. Statzner. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: A comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review Entomology, 51, 495-523 (2006) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.B.N Hynes. The biology of polluted waters. Liverpool University Press. 202 pp. (1960) [Google Scholar]
  7. V.H. Resh. Multinational, freshwater biomonitoring programs in the developing world: Lessons learned from African and southeast Asian river surveys. Environmental Management, 39, 737-748 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.G. Brito, T.M. Renato, C.O. Vivian, H. Neusa, L.N. Jorge, M.H. Robert, S.F.B. Ferraz, R.P. Felipe. Biological indicators of diversity in tropical streams: Congruence in the similarity of invertebrate assemblages. Ecology Indicator, 85, 85-92 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I.C. Campbell, C.C. Bruce, H.R. Vincent. The development and application of biomonitoring in Lower Mekong River system. Chapter 13. Academic Press. 321-333 pp (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. K.W. Cummins, R.W. Merritt, P.C.N. Andrade. The use of invertebrate functional group to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected streams and rivers in south Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environmental, 40 (1), 69-89 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R.T. Martins, S.R. Couceiro, A.S. Melo. M.P. Moreira, N. Hamada. Effects of urbanization on stream benthic invertebrate communities in Central Amazon. Ecol. Indic. 73, 480-491 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. V.H. Resh. Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 1 (3), 131-138 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. A.E. Siegloch, R. Schmitt, M. Spies, M. Petrucio, M.I.M. Hernández. Effects of small changes in riparian forest complexity on aquatic insect bioindicators in Brazilian subtropical streams. Mar. Freshw. Res. 68, 519-527 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Habib, A.R. Yousuf. Benthic macroinvertebrate community of Yousmarg streams (Doodganga stream and Khanshah Manshah canal) in Kashmir Himalaya, India. Journal of Ecology and the Environment, 4 (11), 280-289 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. M.Z. Azrina, C.K.Ã. Yap, A.R. Ismail, A. Ismail, S.G. Tan. Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 64, 337-347 (2006) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Badan Lingkungan Hidup DIY. Dokumen informasi kinerja pengelolaan lingkungan hidup daerah. Available at http://blh.jogjaprov.go.id/po-content/uploads/Buku_Data_IKPLHD_DIY_2016. pdf (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. C.B. Angela, J. Carmona-Jiménez, T. González-Martínez, M. Mazari-Hiriart. Hydrological evaluation of a peri-urban stream and its impact on ecosystem services potential. Global Ecology and Conservation. 3, 628-644 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. C. He, S.B. Malcom, K.S. Dahlberg, B. Fu. A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management. Landsc. Urban Plann, 49, 25-34 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F.W. Stehr. Immature Insects, Vol 1. Kendall/ Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa. 974 pp. (1987) [Google Scholar]
  20. F.W. Stehr. Immature Insects, Vol 2. Kendall/ Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa. 974 pp. (1991) [Google Scholar]
  21. C.J. Walsh, A.H. Roy, J.W. Feminella, P.D. Cottingham, M. Peter, R.P. Morgan II. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24 (3), 706-723 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K.A. Blocksom, B.R. Johnson. Development of a regional macroinvertebrate index for large river bioassessment. Ecological Indicators, 9, 313-328 (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.