Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hydrology
Published online 15 January 2019
  1. Moreno, C. R., Perez-Sanchez, J., Aparicio, J. S., Asenjo, M. D, The Economic Value of Conjoint Local Management in Water Resources Results from a Contingent Valuation in the Boqueron Aquifer. Science of The Environment , 255-264 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. Melkoyan, A, Climate Change Impact on Water Resources and Crop Production in Armenia. Agricultural Water Management , 86-101 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. Khamraev, N, Water Resources and Socio Economic Development in the Stateof the Aral Sea Basin. Hidrological research and Water Management Strategies in Arid and Semi Arid Zone 65-68 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  4. Yesuf, H.M., Assen, M., Alamirew, T., Melesse, A.M., Modeling of sediment yield in Maybar gauged watershed using SWAT, northeast Ethiopia. Catena 127, 191-205 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arthur, M.R. DeVries, J., Introduction and Application of Kinematic Wave Routing Techniques Using HEC-1 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  6. Wanielista, M. Hidrology and Water Quantity Control. New York: John Wiley and son. (1990) [Google Scholar]
  7. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S.W., Gupta, V.K., Karambiri, H., Lakshim, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J.J., Mendiondo, E.M., Connell, O., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J.W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., Zehe, E., IAHS decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol. Sci. J. 48, 857-880 (2003) hysj.48.6.857.51421. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedient, P.B. Huber, W.C., Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 360-364 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  9. Dumairy, Ekonomika Sumberdaya Air Pengantar ke Hidrolika, (1992) [Google Scholar]
  10. Melsen, L.A., Teuling, A.J., Berkum, S.W., Torfs, P.J.J.F., Uijlenhoet, R., Catchments as simple dynamical systems: a case study on methods and data requirements for parameter identification. Water Resour. Res. 50, 5577-5596 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. Correa, A., Windhorst, D., Crespo, P., Celleri, R., Feyen, J., Breuer, L., Continuous versus event-based sampling: how many samples are required for deriving general hydrological understanding on Ecuador’s paramo region? Hydrol. Process. 30, 4059-4073 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Hua, J., Liang, Z., Yu, Z, A Modified Rasional Formula for Flood Design in Small Basin. Journal pf the American Water Resources Assosiation , 1017-1025 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhunya, P.K. et al., Hybrid model for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10 (6), 458-467 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, Z., Koren, V., Reed, S., Smith, M., Zhang, Y., Moreda, F., Cosgrove, B.A., SAC-SMA a priori parameter differences and their impact on distributed hydrologic model simulations, J. Hydrol. 420–421, 216-227 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh, P.K., Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., 2013. A review of the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (2), 239-261 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. Asch, V. Tang, C., Alkema, D., Zhu, J., Zhou, W., An Integrated Model to Assess Critical Rainfall Thresholds for Run-out Distances of Debris Flows, Springer Science, 299-311 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. Bartoletti, N., Casagli, F., Marsili-Libelli, S., Nardi, A., Palandri, L., Data-driven rainfall/runoff modelling based on a neuro-fuzzy inference system. Envi Model Soft, 106, 35-47 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parington, D., Brunner, P., Simmons, C.T., Werner, A.D., Therrien, R., Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C., Evaluation of outputs from automated baseflow separation methods against simulated baseflow from a physically based, surface water-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 458–459, 28-39 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. Hailegeorgis, T.T, Alfredsen, K., High spasialtemporal resolution and integrated surface and subsurface precipitation modelling for a small stormwater catchment, J. Hydrol, 557, 613-630 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Coutu, S., Giudice, D.D., Rossi, L., Barry, D.A., Parsimonious hydrological modelling of urban sewer and river catchments. J. Hydrol. 464–465, 477-484 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gironas, J., Niemann, J.D., Roesner, L.A., Rodriguez, F., Andrieu, H., A morphoclimatic instantaneous unit hydrograph model for urban catchment based on the kinematic wave approximation. J. Hydrol. 377 (3-4), 317-334 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.