EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 76 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 76 (2019) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Disaster Mitigation & Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197603002
Published online 15 January 2019
  1. Keizrul, A. Floods in Malaysia, available at: http://www.icharm.pwri.go.jp/publication/jan_20_22 _2004_ws/ pdf_output/ abdullah.pdf (3 March 2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. Ho, J. C. Coastal Flood Risk Assessment and Coastal Zone Management Case Study of SeberangPerai and Kuantan Pekan in Malaysia. Erasmus Mundus Master’s Thesis in Insurance against Natural Disasters, Joseph Henry Press, Washington DC, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. Aliagha. U. G., Jin. T. E., Choong. W. W., M. NadzriJaafar, and Ali. H. M. 2014. Factors affecting flood insurance purchase in residential properties in Johor, Malaysia. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 3297-3310. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kryžanowski. A., Brilly. M, Rusjan. S, and Schnabl. S. 2014. Review Article: Structural flood-protection measures referring to several European case studies. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 135-142. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker G., Tweed F., and Whittle R. A framework for profiling the characteristics of risk governance in natural hazard contexts. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 155-164 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thieken. A. H., Mariani. S., Longfield. S., and Vanneuville. W. Preface: Flood resilient communities – managing the consequences of flooding. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 33-39. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kreibich, H., Christenberger, S., and Schwarze, R.: 2011. Economic motivation of households to undertake private precautionary measures against floods, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 309-321, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kjellgren. S. Exploring local risk managers’ use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes in Baden-Wurttemberg. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1857-1872. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bubeck, P, Botzen, W. J. W., and Aerts, J. C. J. H. A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behaviour, Risk Anal., 32, 1481-1495, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexakis. D. D., Grillakis. M. G., Koutroulis. A. G., Agapiou. A., Themistocleous. K., Tsanis. I. K., Michaelides. S., Pashiardis. S., Demetriou. C., Aristeidou. K., Retalis. A., Tymvios. F., and Hadjimitsis. D. G. GIS and remote sensing techniques for the assessment of land use change impact on floodhydrology: the case study of Yialias basin in Cyprus. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14,413-426, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jonathan Ali Ogwuche and Ibochi Andrew Abah 2014. Assessment of Flood Disaster Vulnerability for Flood Insurance Programme in Part of Makurdi Floodplain, Benue State, Nigeria. Donnish Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment. Vol 1 (1) pp. 001-005 December. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. Erdlenbruch, K., Thoyer, S., Grelot, F., Kast, R., Enjolras, G. Risk-sharing in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 363-369, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A. Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 1697-1724, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osiel G. D., Mavra S., Gianluca P., Luca P., Phoebe K., Pedro D., Benedicte R., Nabil T., Francois H., and Edmund P. R. Promoting resilient economies by exploring insurance potential for facing coastal flooding and erosion: Evidence from Italy, Spain, France and United Kingdom. Coastal Engineering, 87, 183 -192, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Foudi, S., Oses-Eraso, N. Flood risk management: assessment for prevention with hydro-economic approaches in Markandya, A., Galarraga, I., Sainz de Murieta, E. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Climate Change Adaptation. Taylor & Francis (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutta, D., Herath, S., Musiake, K. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J. Hydrol. 277, 24-49, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Penning-Rowsell, E., Johnson, C., Tunstall, S., Tapsell, S., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Green, C. The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques. Middlesex University Press (2005) [Google Scholar]
  18. Barbier, E.B., Baumgartner, S., Chopra, K., Costello, C., Duraiappah, A., Hassan, R., Kinzig, A., Lehman, M., Pascual, U., Polasky, S., Perrings, C. The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Naeem, S., Bunker, D., Hector, A., Loreau, M., Perrings, C. (Eds.), Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 248-262, Chapter 18, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bremond, P., Grelot, F., Agenais, A. L. Economic evaluation of flood damage to agriculture – review and analysis of existing methods. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 2493-2512, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Merz, B., Thieken, A.H., 2005. Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. J. ydrol. 309, 114-132, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  21. Merz, B., Thieken, A.H.. Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds. Nat. Hazards, 51, 437-458 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A.H., Schmidtke, R. Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 4, 153-163, 2004. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A. Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 1697-1724, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.