EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 76 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 76 (2019) 04008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geomorphology & Atmospheric Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197604008
Published online 15 January 2019
  1. Van Bemmelen, R.W. The Geology of Indonesia. Vol. IA, General Geology of Indonesia and Adjacent Archipelago, Government Printing Office, The Hague. (1949). [Google Scholar]
  2. Suroso, Rodhi, A., and Sutanto. Usulan Penyesuaian Tata Nama Litostratigrafi Kulon Progo, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Kumpulan Makalah Pertemuan Ilmiah Tahunan XV Ikatan Ahli Geologi Indonesia, Volume 1, IAGI-Yogyakarta (1987). [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahardjo, W., Sukandarrumidi and Rosidi, HMD. Peta Geologi Lembar Yogyakarta. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi, Bandung (1995). [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahardjo, W., Sukandarrumidi and Rosidi, HMD. Peta Geologi Lembar Yogyakarta. Pusat Survey Geologi-Badan Geologi-Kementrian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Bronto, S. Fasies Gunungapi dan Aplikasinya. Jurnal Geologi Indonesia, Vol. 1 No. 2. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  6. Budiadi, E. The Role of Tectonism in Controlling Geomorphology in Kulon Progo Area, Yogyakarta, Proceedings PIT IAGI Semarang, The 38th IAGI Annual Conventional and Exhibition. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Barianto, D.H., Kuncoro, P. and Watanabe, K. The Use of Foraminifera Fossils for Reconstructing the Yogyakarta Graben, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of South East Asian Applied Geology, May-August 2010, Vol 2(2), pp 138-143. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Sudradjat, A., Syafri, I., and Budiadi, E. The Geotectonic configuration of Kulon Progo Area, Yogyakarta. Proceeding PIT IAGI Lombok 2010, The 39th IAGI Convention and Exhibition, Lombok (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. Harjanto, A. Vulkanostratigrafi di Daerah Kulon Progo and Sekitarnya, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah MTG, Vol. 4 No. 2, Yogyakarta (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wijono, S. and Haryoprasetyo, H. Pengaruh Alterasi Hidrotermal dalam Proses Pembentukan Tanah untuk Pembuatan Zonasi Kerentanan Gerakan Tanah di Daerah Purwosari-Kebonharjo, Kecamatan Girimulyo-Samigaluh, abupaten Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Kebumian Ke-4, Teknik Geologi FT-UGM, UGM, Yogyakarta (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. Widagdo, A, Pramumijojo, S., Harijoko, A. and Setiawan, A. Preliminary Overview of the Character, Patterns and Styles of The Geologic Structure of Kulon Progo Mountains Area and Its Potential as a Source of The Geological Structural Damage. Proceedings International Conference Jogja Earthquake in Reflection, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional, Yogyakarta (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Widagdo, A, Pramumijojo, S., Harijoko, A. and Setiawan, A. Type, Pattern and Force Direction of the Geological Structure At Kulonprogo Area-Yogyakarta-Indonesia. The 6th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES), Yogyakarta (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. Setiawan, A. Kajian Pendahuluan Kontrol Struktur Geologi Terhadap Sebaran Batuan-Batuan di Daerah Pegunungan Kulon Progo-Yogyakarta. Proseiding Seminar Nasional Kebumian Ke-9, T. Geologi UGM, Yogyakarta (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. Widagdo, A, Pramumijojo, S. and Harijoko, ANU. Rekonstruksi Struktur Geologi Daerah Gunung Ijo di Pegunungan Kulon Progo-Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Sebaran Kekar dan Urat Kuarsa. Proseiding Seminar Nasional Kebumian Ke-10, T. Geologi UGM, Yogyakarta. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall, R., Clements, B., Smyth, H.R. and Cottam, M. A. A New Interpretation Of Java’s Structure. Proceedings, Indonesian Petroleum Association, May, 2007. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. Smyth, H., Hall, R., Hamilton, J. and Kinny, P., 2005. East Java: Cenozoic Basins, Volcanoes And Ancient Basement. Proceedings Indonesian Petroleum Association, Thirtieth Annual Convention and Exhibition. [Google Scholar]
  17. Husein, S., and Nukman, M., 2015. Rekonstruksi Tektonik Mikrokontinen Pegunungan Selatan Jawa Timur: Sebuah Hipotesis berdasarkan Analisis Kemagnetan Purba. Proseding Seminar Nasional Kebumian Ke-8, FT-UGM, Yogyakarta. [Google Scholar]
  18. Syafri, I., Budiadi, E. and Sudrajad, A., 2013. Geotectonic Configuration of Kulon Progo Area, Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Geology, Vol. 8 No.4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barianto, D.H., Abboud, E. and Setijadji, L.D., 2009. Structural Analysis using Landsat TM, Gravity Data, and Paleontological Data from Tertiary Rocks in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, Vol. 69, No.2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Soeria-Atmadja, R., Maury, R.C., Bellon, H., Pringgopawir, H., Polves, M., and Priadi, B. Tertiary Magmatic Belts In Java, Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences. Vol 9, No.1. (1994). [Google Scholar]
  21. Akmaluddin, Setijadji, D.L., Watanabe, K., and Itaya, T. New Interpretation on Magmatic Belts Evolution During the Neogene-Quarternary Periods as Revealed from Newly Collected K-Ar Ages from Central-East Java, Indonesia. Proceedings Joint Convention Surabaya-HAGI-IAGI-PERHAPI, The 30th HAGI, The 34th IAGI, and The 14th PERHAPI Annual Conference and Exhibition, Surabaya. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  22. Bronto, S. Geologi Gunung Api Purba. Publikasi Khusus, Badan Geologi, Kementrian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral, Bandung. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  23. Bogie, I. and Mckenzie, K.M., 1998. The Aplication Of Volcanic Facies Models To An Andesitic Stratovolcano Hosted Geothermal System At Wayang Windu, Java, Indonesia. Proceedings 20th NZ Geothermal Workshop [Google Scholar]
  24. Sabins, F.F., Remote Sensing Principles and Interpretation, 3rd edition, New York, 93 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.