Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 86, 2019
The First International Scientific Conference on Ecological and Environmental Engineering 2018
Article Number 00021
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 22 February 2019
  1. Tzanakakis V. A., Paranychianakis N.V., Angelakis A. N., Ecol. Eng., Vol. 35, 10, 1485–1492, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wright K.R., J. Civ. Eng. - ASCE, 88-89, (1976). [Google Scholar]
  3. Huber D., Palmateer G., Snowfluent - A join experimental project between Southwest Region of the Ministry of the Environment and Delta Engineering in the storage and renovation of sewage effluent by conversion to snow. MOE Rep. ON, Canada, (1985). [Google Scholar]
  4. White J.A., Treatment of sewage by conversion to snow - Full scale operation - Bruce, Report, Delta Engineering, ON, Canada, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  5. White J.A., Evaluation of freeze-crystallization process in full scale pilot project - Carrabassett Valley, Report, Delta Engineering, Ottawa, Canada, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  6. Sego, D.C., Use of Natural freeze-thaw processes to separate and treat mine waste water. Proceedings from IWC-96, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  7. Szpaczynski J. A., White J. A., Experimental studies on the application of natural process of snow metamorphism for concentration and purification of liquid wastes. Water Environment Federation and Purdue University Industrial Wastes Technical Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  8. Sego, D.C., D. W. Smith, W. Gao, J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 2 (5), 325–334, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao W., Desalin., 268, 170–173, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Szpaczynski J. A., Przem. Chem., 1,(9), 82-86, in Polish. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. Szpaczynski J. A., Biochemical evaluation of AFC meltwater - Carrabassett Valley. Report, Delta Engineering, Ottawa, Canada, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibson T., Compress Air, Dec. 18-23, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  13. White J. A, Szpaczynski J. A., Landfill Leachate treatment and disposal - Chester. Report, Northern Watertek Corp., Ottawa - Vars, Canada, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Colbeck S.C., J. Geophys. Res., 88, 5475–5482, (1983). [Google Scholar]
  15. Szpaczynski J. A., White J. A., Cote C. L., Chem. Process Eng., 38, No. 2, 249-264, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taft R.A., The advanced waste treatment research program. Report, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, (1965). [Google Scholar]
  17. Baker R.A., Water Res., 1, 61-77 and 97-113, (1967). [Google Scholar]
  18. Vesilind P.A., Martel J.C., J. Environ. Eng., 116 (5), 855–862, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  19. Vose J. M., G. J. Harvey, K. J. Elliott, B. D. Clinton, Measuring and modeling tree and stand level transpiration, in Phytoremediation: Transformation and Control of Contaminants. Ed. S. C. McCutcheon and J. L. Schnoor, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  20. Avery C. C., Dexter L. R., Wier R. R., Delinger W. G., Tecle A., Becker J. R., Where has all the snow gone? Snowpack sublimation in Northern Arizona. Western Snow Conference, Wyoming, 18-23, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  21. USDA-CSREES Regional Committee, Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No 396, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  22. Rice E. W., R.B. Baird, A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, editors, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Edition, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan H. K., Principles of soil chemistry, CRC Press, 4th ed., (2011). [Google Scholar]
  24. Tzanakakis V. A., Paranychianakis N.V., Angelakis A. N., Ecol. Eng., 37, 11, 1757–1764, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  25. EPA Report, EPA-625/4-76-010. (1976). [Google Scholar]
  26. Dunne E. J., Clark M. W., Mitchell J., Jawitz J. W., Reddy K. R., Ecol. Eng., 36, 1392–1400, (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.