Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 89, 2019
The 2018 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2018)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Improved SCAL techniques and Interpretation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198902003
Published online 29 March 2019
  1. Walsgrove, T., Stromberg, S., Lowden, B. and Basan, P., 1997, “Integration of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Core Analysis and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs: An Example from the North Sea, UK. SPWLA 38th Annual Logging Symposium, 15–18 June 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marschall, D., Gardner, J.S., Mardon, D., Coates, G.R., “Method for Correlating NMR Relaxometry and Mercury Injection Data”, Paper SCA1995-11, Proc. Int. Symposium of Society of Core Analysts , (1995). [Google Scholar]
  3. Lowden, B.D., and Porter, M.J., “T2 Relaxation Time Versus Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure: Implication for NMR Logging and Reservoir Characterization” Paper SPE 50607, SPE European Petroleum Conference, The Hague, (1998), Oct. 20-22. [Google Scholar]
  4. Volokitin, Y., Looyestijn, W.J., Slijkerman, W.F.J., Hofman. J.P., “A Practical Approach to Obtain Primary Drainage Capillary Pressure Curves from NMR Core and Log Data”, Paper SCA1999-25, Proc. Int. Symposium of Society of Core Analysts , (1999). [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Coates, L. Xiao and M. Prammer, NMR Logging Principles & Applications, Halliburton Energy Services, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  6. Shafer, J. and Neasham, J., “Mercury Porosimetry Protocol for Rapid Determination of Petrophysical and Reservoir Quality Properties”, Paper SCA2000-21, Proc. Int. Symposium of Society of Core Analysts , (2000). [Google Scholar]
  7. Lenormand, R., “Interpretation of Mercury Injection Curves to Derive Pore Size Distributions”, Paper SCA2003–052, Proc. Int. Symposium of Society of Core Analysts , (2003). [Google Scholar]
  8. Brandimarte, F., Eriksson, M. and Moss, A., “How to Obtain Primary Drainage Capillary Pressure Curves Using NMR T2 Distributions in a Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir,” Paper SCA2017–066, Proc. Int. Symposium of Society of Core Analysts , (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. Amaefule, J. O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D.G. and Keelan. D.K., “Enhanced reservoir description: using core & log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units & predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells”, 1993, SPE No. 26436. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.