Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 2019
7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geomaterial Behaviour: Fabric and Fabric Evolution
Published online 25 June 2019
  1. M. Pedrotti, A. Tarantino. Inter-aggregate structural interpretation of compression behaviour of compacted Kaolin clay. In: Unsaturated Soils. CRC Press, Leiden, 739-745. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. I. F. C. Otalvaro. Comportamento Hidromecânico de um Solo Tropical Compactado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geotecnia. Universidade de Brasília. 122. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. R. Borges. Estudo inter-aggregateestrutural do comportamento hidromecânico do solo de Brasília-DF. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geotecnia. Universidade de Brasília. 111. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. C. F. L. Lopes. Inter-aggregate structural based approach to the modelling of clays and transitional soils behaviour. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geotecnia. Universidade de Brasília. 133. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. K. Mitchell, K.K Soga,. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, INC, 558. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. C. Santamarina. Soil Behaviour at the Inter-aggregate scale: Particle Forces. Proc. Symp. Soil Behaviour and Soft Ground Construction, MIT. 1-32. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  7. E. J. W. Verwey, J. TH. G. Overbeek. Theory of the stability of Lyophobic colloids: the interaction of soil particles having and electric double layer. Elsevier. 205. (1948). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. N. Israelachvili. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. Elsevier Inc. 706p. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Thom, R. Sivakumar, V, Sivakumar, E. J. Murray, P. Mackinnon. Pore size distribution of unsaturated compacted Kaolin: the initial states and final states following saturation. Technical note. Géotechnique, 57(5), 469-474. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Tarantino, E. De Col. Compaction behaviour of clay. Géotechnique. 58(3), 199-213. (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Tarantino, E. De Col. Compaction behaviour of clay-Discussion. Géotechnique, 59(1), 75-77. (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. R. Bagherieh, N. Khalili, G. Habibagahi, A. Ghahramani. Drying response and effective stress in a dual-porosity aggregated soil. Engineering Geology, 105 (1-2), 44-50. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. K. Foong, N. A. Rahman, M. Z. Ramli. A laboratory study of deformable double-porosity soil with distinct / (various) moisture content under vibration effect. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 28(3), 207-222. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. D. F. Villibor, J. S. Nogami. Pavimentos Econômicos: tecnologia do uso dos solos finos lateríticos. Arte & Ciência. 292. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. H. Wang, W. K. Siu. Structure characteristics and mechanical properties of kaolinite soils. I. Surface charges and structural characterizations. Canadian Geotechnical. Journal, 43(6), 587-600. (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sridharan, S. M. Rao, N. S. Murthy. Liquid Limit of kaolinitic Soils. Géotechnique, 38(2), 191-198. (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Sridharan, K. Prakash. Characteristic water contents for a fine-grained soil-water system. Géotechnique, 48(3), 337-346. (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. E. Fearon, M. R. Coop. Reconstitution: what makes an appropriate reference material? Géotechnique, 50(4), 471-477. (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Durner. Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resources Research, 30, 211-223. (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Van Genutchen. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892-898 (1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.