Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 2019
7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
Article Number 10005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geomaterial Behaviour: Coupled Effects
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199210005
Published online 25 June 2019
  1. M. Calvello, M. Lasco, R. Vassallo, and C. Di Maio, Italian Geotechnical Journal, 1, p. 34-46 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Di Maio, Geotechnique, 48, 3, p. 433-436 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Di Maio, Geotechnique, 46, 4, p. 695-707 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Di Maio and G.B. Fenelli, Geotechnique, 44, 2, p. 217-226 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Di Maio and R. Onorati. in VIII International Symposium on landslides, Cardiff (2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Di Maio, L. Santoli, and P. Schiavone, Mechanics of Materials, 36, 5, p. 435-451( 2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D.M. Pontolillo, J. De Rosa, G. Scaringi, and C. Di Maio, in Vi Italian Conference of Researchers in Geotechnical Engineering, Cnrig2016-Geotechnical Engineering in Multidisciplinary Research: From Microscale to Regional Scale, p. 69-74 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. I.T. Rosenqvist, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 311, 1517, p. 369-373 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C.E. Martínez and H.L. Motto, Environ. Pollut., 107, 1, p. 153-158 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  10. R.W.W. Anson and A.B. Hawkins, Geotechnique, 48, 6, p. 787-800 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Cavallaro and M.B. McBride, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 5, p. 1050-1054 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  12. N.T. Basta, D.J. Pantone, and M.A. Tabatabai, AGRON. J.,. 85, 5, p. 1054-1057 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.E. Martinez., Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick: Ann Arbor. p. 108 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.B. McBride, Environmental Chemistry of Soils., New York: Oxford University Press (1994) [Google Scholar]
  15. H.B. Bradl, J. of Colloid and Interface Science, 277, 1, p. 1-18 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B.E. Reed and S.R. Cline, Separation Science and Technology, 29, 12, p. 1529-1551 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Theriault and K. Nkongolo, Am. J. Environ. Sci., 12, 2, p. 55-62 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Di Maio, The influence of pore fluid composition on the residual shear strength of some natural clayey soils. Landslides, ed. K. Senneset, Rotterdam: A a Balkema. 1189-1194 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  19. M.J. Ridge, SPWLA-1983-vXXIVn3a1, 24, 3, p. 6 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.S. Pouralhosseni, in Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Ravina and N. Maoramarco, Zeta-Meter, Inc. (1993) [Google Scholar]
  22. V.R. Ouhadi, R.N. Yong, and M. Sedighi, Applied Clay Science, 32, 3, p. 217-231 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Dutta and A.K. Mishra, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 21, 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. R.N. Yong, Geoenvironmental engineering: Contaminated soils, pollutant fate, and mitigation. CRC press (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Dutta and A.K. Mishra, Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 11, p. 10 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Liu, X. Ma, and W. Dai, Trans Tech Publications: Applied Mechanics and Materials. p. 1921-1929 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Guglielmi, in Department of Civil, Environmental, Land, Building Engineering and Chemistry, Politecnico di Bari, p. 578 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Beetham, T. Dijkstra, N. Dixon, P. Fleming, R. Hutchison, and J. Bateman, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 168, 2, p. 81-95 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P.T. Sherwood, PB 194 134. Crowthorne, Berk.: Road Research Laboratory, Earthworks and Foundations Section; [Reproduced by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific & Technical Information, Springfield, Va.] (1970) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.