Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 98, 2019
16th International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction (WRI-16) and 13th International Symposium on Applied Isotope Geochemistry (1st IAGC International Conference)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Water-Rock Interaction During Oil and Gas Field Development and Operation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199803002
Published online 07 June 2019
  1. M.S. Blondes, K.D. Gans, M.A. Engle, Y.K. Kharaka, M.E. Reidy, V. Saraswathula, J.J. Thordsen, E.L. Rowan, E.A. Morrissey, U.S. Geological Survey National Produced Waters Geochemical Database v2.3 (2018), v2.4 (2019) https://energy.usgs.gov/EnvironmentalAspects/EnvironmentalAspectsofEnergyProductionandUse/ProducedWaters.aspx#3822349-data [Google Scholar]
  2. IHS. Enerdeq Energy Information Access and Integration Platform, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. Y.K. Kharaka, J.S. Hanor, Surface and Groundwater, Weathering and Soils. 471-515 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. E.L. Rowan, M.A. Engle, T.F. Kramer, K.T. Schroeder, R.W. Hamack, M.W. Daughten, AAPG Bulletin, 99, 181-206 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A.G. Ilgen, J.E. Heath, I.Y. Akkutlu, L.T. Bryndzia, D.R. Cole, Y.K. Kharaka, T.J. Kneafsey, K.L. Milliken, L.J. Pyrak-Nolte, R. Suarez-Rivera, Earth-Science Rev. 166, 132-152, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2018 with Projections to 2050. Report #AEO 2018. www.eia.gov/aeo (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. J.P. Nicot, B.R. Scanlon, R.C. Reedy, R. Costley, Env. Sci. & Tech. 48, n. 4, 2464-2471, http://doi.org/10.1021/es404050r (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T.J. Gallegos, B.A. Varela, S.S. Haines, M.A. Engle, Water Resources Research, 51 n. 7 10.1002/2015WR017278 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. N.R. Warner, T.H. Darrah, R.B. Jackson, R. Millot, W. Kloppmann, A. Vengosh, E.S.&T. 48, 12552-12560 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. G.N. Breit, C.C. Skinner, Produced Waters Database: U.S. Geological Survey Provisional Release (May 2002) http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/prov/prodwat/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  11. Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. P.H. Nelson, and S.L. Santus, USGS Open-File Report 2011-1175, 2 pls. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.A. Rice, V.F. Nuccio, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-156-00, http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-0156-00/ (2000) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Veil, U.S. Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices in 2012. Report prepared for Ground Water Protection Council. Veil Environmental, LLC, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y.K. Kharaka, D.R. Gans, J.J. Thordsen, M.S. Blondes, M.A. Engle, Subsurface Science and Engineering of Shale, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in print (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. U.S. EPA, Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources. EPA/600/R-15/047 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. Vengosh,W.A. Mitch, L.M. McKenzie, E.S.&T. 51, 10271-10273 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. W.L. Ellsworth, Science, 341, doi:10.1126/science.1225942. (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.