Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 99, 2019
Central Asian DUst Conference (CADUC 2019)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 4
Section Impacts of atmospheric dust
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199904005
Published online 18 June 2019
  1. C.L. Heald; D.A. Ridley; J.H. Kroll; S.R.H. Barrett; K.E. Cady-Pereira; M.J. Alvarado; C.D. Holmes. Contrasting the direct radiative effect and direct radiative forcing of aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 5513-5527 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013; p 1535, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. A.A. Lacis; M.I. Mishchenko. Climate forcing, climate sensitivity, and climate response: A radiative modeling perspective on atmospheric aerosols. In Aerosol forcing of climate: Report of the dahlem workshop on aerosol forcing of climate, Charlson, R.J.; Heintzenberg, J., Eds. John Wiley Sons: Chichester, England / New York (1994) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Wendisch; O. Hellmuth; A. Ansmann; J. Heintzenberg; R. Engelmann; D. Althausen; H. Eichler; D. Müller; M. Hu; Y. Zhang, et al. Radiative and dynamic effects of absorbing aerosol particles over the pearl river delta, china. Atmospheric Environment 42, 6405-6416 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Ming; V. Ramaswamy. Nonlinear climate and hydrological responses to aerosol effects. Journal of Climate 22, 1329-1339 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Huang; T. Wang; W. Wang; Z. Li; H. Yan. Climate effects of dust aerosols over east asian arid and semiarid regions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119, 11, 398-311, 416 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Koch; A.D. Del Genio. Black carbon semidirect effects on cloud cover: Review and synthesis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7685-7696 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Tegen; B. Heinold. Large-scale modeling of absorbing aerosols and their semi-direct effects. Atmosphere 2018, accepted. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Zhang; D. O’Donnell; J. Kazil; P. Stier; S. Kinne; U. Lohmann; S. Ferrachat; B. Croft; J. Quaas; H. Wan, et al. The global aerosolclimate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2:Sensitivity to improvements in process representations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8911-8949 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Stevens; M. Giorgetta; M. Esch; T. Mauritsen; T. Crueger; S. Rast; M. Salzmann; H. Schmidt; J. Bader; K. Block, et al. Atmospheric component of the mpi-m earth system model: ECHAM6. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 5, 146-172 (2013) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S.J. Ghan; X. Liu; R.C. Easter; R. Zaveri; P.J. Rasch; J.-H. Yoon; B. Eaton. Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models:Comparative decomposition of aerosol direct, semidirect, and indirect radiative forcing. Journal of Climate 25, 6461-6476 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.