Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 103, 2019
2019 4th International Conference on Advances on Clean Energy Research (ICACER 2019)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Energy Efficiency Analysis
Published online 17 June 2019
  1. L. Ding, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Huang, and Y. Fang, "Interaction and its induced inhibiting or synergistic effects during co-gasification of coal char and biomass char," Bioresour. Technol., vol. 173, pp. 11–20, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. B. Krishna, B. Biswas, P. Ohri, J. Kumar, R. Singh, and T. Bhaskar, "Pyrolysis of Cedrus deodara saw mill shavings in hydrogen and nitrogen atmosphere for the production of bio-oil," Renew. Energy, vol. 98, pp. 238–244, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Aldana, F. J. Lozano, J. Acevedo, and A. Mendoza, "Thermogravimetric characterization and gasification of pecan nut shells," Bioresour. Technol., vol. 198, pp. 634–641, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. U. A. E. de S. P. (UAESP), "Documento técnico de soporte del plan de gestión integral de residuos sólidos para Bogotá D.C.," (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Niño, L. T. Vega, and B. Ruiz, "Evaluation of the energy potential of the gorse (ulex europaeus) in the generation of electrical energy by gasification," Chem. Eng. Trans., vol. 64, no. 2008, pp. 481–486, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. Jardín Botánico de Bogotá, "Descripción de las acciones realizadas en el proceso de intervención y recuperación de áreas invadidas de retamo como medida de mitigación de incendios forestales," (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. González, J. R. Riba, R. Puig, and P. Navarro, "Review of micro- and small-scale technologies to produce electricity and heat from Mediterranean forests’ wood chips," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 43, pp. 143–155, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Dhyani and T. Bhaskar, "A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass," Renew. Energy, vol. 129, pp. 695–716, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Gai, Y. Dong, and T. Zhang, "The kinetic analysis of the pyrolysis of agricultural residue under non-isothermal conditions," Bioresour. Technol., vol. 127, pp. 298–305, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Slopiecka, P. Bartocci, and F. Fantozzi, "Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of poplar wood pyrolysis," Appl. Energy, vol. 97, pp. 491–497, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Chen, M. Hu, X. Zhu, D. Guo, S. Liu, Z. Hu, B. Xiao, J. Wang, and M. Laghari, "Characteristics and kinetic study on pyrolysis of five lignocellulosic biomass via thermogravimetric analysis," Bioresour. Technol., vol. 192, pp. 441–450, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Quan, N. Gao, and Q. Song, "Pyrolysis of biomass components in a TGA and a fixed-bed reactor: Thermochemical behaviors, kinetics, and product characterization," J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 121, pp. 84–92, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Munir, S. S. Daood, W. Nimmo, A. M. Cunliffe, and B. M. Gibbs, "Thermal analysis and devolatilization kinetics of cotton stalk, sugar cane bagasse and shea meal under nitrogen and air atmospheres," Bioresour. Technol., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1413–1418, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Cai, D. Xu, Z. Dong, X. Yu, Y. Yang, S. W. Banks, and A. V. Bridgwater, "Processing thermogravimetric analysis data for isoconversional kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: Case study of corn stalk," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 82, no. April 2017, pp. 2705–2715, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Codensa, "Tarifas energía Eléctrica.pdf,"(2019). [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  16. L. V. Martínez, "Producción de energía eléctrica a partir de la gasificación de raquis de maíz blanco (Zea mayz) producidos en la Central de abastos de Bogotá - Corabastos," (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.