Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 112, 2019
8th International Conference on Thermal Equipment, Renewable Energy and Rural Development (TE-RE-RD 2019)
Article Number 03014
Number of page(s) 8
Section Rural Development
Published online 20 August 2019
  1. A. Almodares, M. R. Hadi, H. Ahmadpour, Sorghum stem yield and soluble carbohydrates under different salinity levels. African Journal of Biotechnology, vol.7, pp. 4051– 4055 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Karp, I. Shield, Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02432.x., Journal New Phytologist, vol. 179, Issue 1, pp.15–32, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. B.V.S. Reddy, S. Ramesh, S. P. Reddy, B. Ramaiah, P.M. Salimath, R. Kachapur, Sweet sorghum -a potential alternative raw material for bioethanol and bio-energy. Int Sorghum Millets Newsl, vol. 46, pp. 79–86, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Babeanu, Gh. Matei, A. M. Dodocioiu, Evaluation of sugar content in stem juice from sweet sorghum hybrids grown in south west of Romania. Annals of the University of Craiova -Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre Series, vol. 47, p. 25–29, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. Gh. Matei, Study on yield features of sweet sorghum hybrids grown in south west of Romania. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016,, SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-619-7105-68-1 / ISSN 1314-2704, Book 6, vol. 1, DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2016/B61/S25.104, pp. 783–790, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Kun-Jun, W. D. Pitman, K. Misook, F. D. Donal, W. A. Montgomery, E. Michael, Mc Cormick, G. Aita, 2012, Ethanol production potential of sweet sorghum assessedusing forage fiber analysis procedures, GCB Bioenergy, vol. 5, doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01203.x, pp. 358–366, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7., Sorghum ID -The Future is on the sorghum-the First European Congress of Sores – a founding act: “Sorghum in Europe: A real potential”, Bucharest (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Antohe, Achievements in the improvement of sorghum, Annals. N.A.R.D.I. Fundulea, Vol. 75, 2007, JUBILEE VOLUME, pp. 137–157, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Tesu, V. Baghinschi, Energy and agriculture, Ed. Ceres, Bucharest, (1984). [Google Scholar]
  10. K. S. Vinutha, L. Rayaprolu, K. Yadagiri, A. V. Umakanth, J. V. Patil, P. Srinivasa Rao, Sweet Sorghum Research and Development in India: Status and Prospects. Sugar Tech, DOI 10.1007/s12355-014-0302-9, ISSN: 0972-1525, Vol. 16 (2), pp:133–143 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Balota, W.A. Payne, W. Rooney, D. Rosenow, Gas exchange and transpiration ratio in sorghum. Crop Science, vol. 48, pp. 2361–2371, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. N. Olson, K. Ritter, W. Rooney, A. Kemanian, B. A. McCarl, Y. Zhang, S. Hall, D. Packer, J. Mullet, High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, vol. 6, issue 6, pp. 640–655, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. R. Khalill, H. A. Hussien, S. R. Abazied, New Approach for Using Different Forms of Sweet Sorghum Syrup in Cake Making. World Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 2, No. 2, doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20180202.11,, pp. 25–32, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Shukla, T. J. Felderhoff, A. Saballos, W. Vermerris, The relationship between plant height and sugar accumulation in the stems of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), Field Crops Research, vol. 203, 1, pp. 181–191, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. U. Xin, R. Aiken, J. Burke, Genetic diversity of transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crops Research, vol. 111, pp. 74–80, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Xin, C. Franks, P. Payton, J.J. Burke, A simple method to determine transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crops Research, vol. 107, pp. 180–183, (2008). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.