Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 126, 2019
International Conference on Modern Trends in Manufacturing Technologies and Equipment (ICMTMTE 2019)
Article Number 00066
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 30 October 2019
  1. A.L. Bolsherotov, System for assessment of environmental safety of construction, Publisher of Construction university association, Moscow. ISBN 978-5-93093-757 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. E.E. Rumyanceva, U.D. Gubernsky, T.U. Kulakova, Environmental safety of construction materials, designs and products (MoscowUniversity, book) (ISBN 598699-010-2) [Google Scholar]
  3. T.A. Horuzhaya, Assessment of environmental safety, («Service book», Moscow, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  4. A.G. Shmal, Methodics of creation of national system on environmental safety, Environmental harbinger of Russia, 7, 57–59 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.G. Shmal, Methodological basis for creating environmental safety system (MP «IKC» BNTV, Bronnici, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. V.L. Bondarenko, A.B. Ilyasov, E.D. Hecuriani, Methodological basis of environmental-technical system in operation of water management facilities: areas of basins, monography (Novocherkassk, URGPU (NPI), 2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. V.L. Bondarenko, E.A. Semenova, A.V. Alipherov, O.V. Klimenko, Environmental- technical systems in operation of water management facilities: areas of basin geosystems, monography (Novocherkassk, URGPU (NPI), 2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. V.A. Volosuchin, V.L. Bondarenko, Basics of methodological systematic analysis environmental-technical systems of operation of water management facilities, bulletin «Usage and protection of natural resources in Russia», 5, 15–24, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Saling, A. Kicherer, B. Dittrich-Kramer, R. Wittlinger, W. Zombik, I. Schmidt, W. Schrottand S. Schmidt, Life Cycle Management, Eco-eff1ciency Analysis by BASF, The Method (Germany, BASF, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Saling, R. Hofer(ed), “Metrics for Sustainability” as part of RSC Green Chemistry Sustainable Solutions for Modern Economies Edited by Rainer Hqfer; The Royal Society of Chemistry;, Green Chemistry Series“ edited bythe Royal Society of Chemistry Series Editors: J. Clark, University of York; G. Kraus, Iowa State University, 4, 25–37 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  11. River BasinsUnder. Ed. ChernyaevaA., (Yekaterinburg, Moscow., RosNIIIVH “Agroecology”, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Davis Ged, Energy for Planet Earth, In the World of Science, 11, 7–16 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  13. E.D. Khetsuriani, L.N. Fesenko, V.P. Kostyukov, T.E. Khetsuriani, Obtaining a regression equation and evaluating their adequacy for analyzing field studies, Obtaining a regression equation and evaluating their adequacy for analyzing field data Research, Norwegian Journal of the Development of International Science, 9(2), 69–72 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Barnes, F. Galgani, R. Thompsonand M. Barlaz, The accumulation and fragmentation of plastic waste in global conditions Phil. Transaction R. Soc., 364, 1985–1998 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.J. Behrenfeldand E. Boss, Beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration as alternative optical indicators of phytoplankton biomass J. Mar. Res, 64, 431–451 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. M.J.I. Berenfeld, P.G. Falkowski, The rate of photosynthesis obtained from satellite concentration of chlorophyll Limnol, Oceanogr, 42, 1–20 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Cole et al., Microplastic ingestion, Zooplankton Environment, Sci. Technol, 47, 6646–6655 (2001), [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Dellnitz, G. Froyland, C. Horenkamp, K. Padberg-Gehleand A. SenGupta, Seasonal variability of subpolar cycles in the Southern Ocean: a numerical study based on transport operators Non-linear process, Geophys, 16, 655–664 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Froyland, K. Padberg, M.H. Englandand A-M Treguier, Detection of Coherent Oceanic Structures Using Phys Operators, Rev. Lett, 98, 224503. (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M.R. Gregory, Environmental Impacts of Plastic Garbage in Marine Conditions - Entangling, Swallowing, Strangulation, Suspension, Hitchhiking and Alien Intrusion Phil Trans. R. Soc. B, 364, 2013–2025 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. C-M. Lebreton, S.D. Greerand J.C. Borrero, Numerical simulation of floating debris in the oceans, March. Pollut. Bull, 64, 653–661 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R.C. Thompson, C.J. Moore, vom SaalF.S.and S.H. Swan, Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends Phil, Trans. R. Soc. B, 364, 2153–2166 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. VanSebille,, a free, fast, and easy tool for the quantitative study of planktonic drift in the global ocean J. Exp. Mar. Biol, Ecology, 461, 317–22 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. T.L. Delworthetal., GFDL CM2 Models with Global Climate Connectivity: I. Formulation and Simulation Characteristics, J. Clim., 19, 643–674 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. Z. Babmski, Modern Processes of the Lower Cretan Vistula (geographical work), Wroclaw-Warsaw-Krakow, v.157, 172 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  26. G.P. Williams, M.G. Wolman, Influence of dams downstream on alluvial riversprofessional article by the US Geological Survey, 1286, 83 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  27. G.G. Onishchenko, Influence of the state of the environment on public health. Unresolved problems, Gig. Isan, 1, 3–1. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  28. D.J. Dawson, D.P. Sartory, Microbiological safety of water, Brit. Med. Bull, 56(1), 74–83 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Puyment, A. Berte, M. Prevost, B. Menard, B. Barbeau, Occurence of pathogenic microorganisms in the Suit-Lawrence River (Canada) and comparison of health risks for population of using it as their sourse of drinking water, Can. J. Microbiol, 46(6), 565–576 (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.