EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 129 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 129 (2019) 01024 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2019
1st International Scientific Conference “Problems in Geomechanics of Highly Compressed Rock and Rock Massifs” (GHCRRM 2019)
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912901024
Published online 09 December 2019
  1. X.T. Feng, J.A. Hudson, Rock engineering risk. - CRC Press, 572 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. V.V. Makarov, L.S. Ksendzenko, A.M. Golosov, N.A. Opanasiuk, Reversibledeformation phenomena of a high stressed rock samples. Rock Engineeringand Rock Mechanics: Structures in and on Rock Masses - Alejano, Perucho,Olalla & Jimenez (Eds) © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, 267-272(2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. I.S. Tomashevskaya, Ya.N. Khamidullin, Precursors of the destruction of rocksamples. Izv. USSR Academy of Sciences. Earth Sciences, 5. 12-20 (1972) (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  4. M.A. Guzev, V.N. Odintsev, V.V. Makarov. Principals of geomechanics ofhighly stressed rock and rock massifs. Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology, 81, 506-511 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.A. Sadovsky, L.G. Bolhovitinov, V.F. Pisarenko, Deforming of geophysicalmedium and seismic process, 101 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  6. I.M. Petukhov, I.M. Batugina, Geodynamics of bowels of the earth. 288 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Coburn, R. Spence, Earthquake protection. John Wiley AND Sons, 428(2003) [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Disasters Vulnerability Analysis. Office of the United Nations DisasterRelief Coordinator (UNDRO). - Geneva. 311 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  9. H.H. Einstein Risk and risk analysis in rock engineering. Tunnelling andUnderground Space Technology, 11-2, 141-155 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. E.V. Leary, Earthquakes: Risk, Monitoring and Research. New York: NovaScience, 526 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Folger, Earthquakes: risk, monitoring, notification, and research. Library ofCongress Washington DC Congressional Research Service (2008) [Google Scholar]
  12. C.S. Oliveira, A. X. Roca (ed.). Assessing and managing earthquake risk: geo-scientific and engineering knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation: developments,tools, techniques. Springer Science AND Business Media, 2 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. A. Sobolev, A.B. Ponomarev Physics of earthquakes and precursors. 270(2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Mogi, Earthquake Prediction. Academic Press, Tokyo, 355 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  15. Ragnar Stefansson, Advances in Earthquake Prediction. Research and RiskMITIGATION. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 274 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Milne, Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements. International scientificseries, 56. New York: K. Paul, Trench, 363 (1886) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Milne, Seismic science in Japan, Trans. seism. Soc. Jpn., 1, 3-33 (1880) [Google Scholar]
  18. W.H. Hobbs, Earthquakes, Appleton. New York, NY (1907) [Google Scholar]
  19. G.K. Gilbert, Earthquake forecasts. Science. 29, 121-138 (1909) [Google Scholar]
  20. H.J. Reid, The California Earthquake of April 18. 1906. Vol. II, TheMechanics of the Earthquake, Rept State Earthquake InvestigationCommission, Carnegie Institution of Science. 803-810 (1906) [Google Scholar]
  21. E.A. Hodgson, A proposed research into the possibilities of earthquakeprediction. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 13, 100-104 (1923) [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Landsberg, The problem of earthquake prediction. Science. 82, 37.Washington, Washington, DC (1910) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Langbein, Earthquake explanations. Nature. 349-6307. 287 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. J. Geller, Earthquake prediction: a critical review. Geophys. J. Int., 131,425-450 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  25. C.H. Scholz, L.R. Sykes, Y.P. Aggarw, Earthquake prediction: a physical basis(1971) [Google Scholar]
  26. I.P. Dobrovolsky, Mathematical theory of preparation and the forecast oftectonic earthquake. PHYSMATHLIT, 240 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. R.J. Geller, D.D. Jackson, Y.Y. Kagan, F. Mulargia, Earthquakes Cannot BePredicted. Science. 275-5306 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  28. S.V. Goldin, Makro and mesostructures of the source earthquake areas. ThePhysical mesomechanics, 8, N° 1, 3-14 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  29. D.A. Lockner, J.D. Byerlee, V.S. Kuksenko, A. Ponomarev, A. Sidorin, Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite. Nature, 350(7),39-42(1991) [Google Scholar]
  30. W.F. Brace et al. Dilatancy in fracture of crystalline rocks. J. Geophys.Research, 16(71),3930-3953 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  31. V.V. Makarov, Calculation of lining of city shallow tunnels on action of asurface loading. GIAB, 74-81 (2013) (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. M.A. Guzev, V.V. Makarov, Deforming and failure of the high stressed rocksaround openings, Vladivostok: RAS Edit (2007) (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. J.R. Rice,The Mechanics of Earthquake Rupture. In Physics of the Earth'sInterior. Italian Physical Society and North-Holland Publ. Co., 555-649 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  34. V.N. Odintsev, Tensile destruction of a brittle rock masses. M: IPKON,Russian Academy of Sciences (1996 ) (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  35. M.A. Guzev, V.V. Makarov, A.A. Ushakov, Modeling elastic behavior of compressed rock samples in the pre-failure zone, Journal of Mining Science,41(6), 497-590 (2005) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.