Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 131, 2019
2nd International Conference on Biofilms (ChinaBiofilms 2019)
Article Number 01127
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913101127
Published online 19 November 2019
  1. Dolzyk G, Jung S. Tensile and Fatigue Analysis of 3D-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2019(1):1-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoffman J D, Miller R L. Kinetic of crystallization from the melt and chain folding in polyethylene fractions revisited: theory and experiment [J]. Polymer, 1997, 38(13): 3151-3212. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kurtz S M, Muratoglu O K, Evans M, et al. Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty[J]. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(18): 1659-1688. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ward I M. Recent developments in the science and technology of high modulus flexible polymers[J]. Macromolecular Symposia, 1995, 100 (1):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Seregina T N, Isaeva V I, Kadontseva T I. Polyethylene monofilaments for fishing equipment[J]. Fibre Chemistry, 1991, 22(4): 287-289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wenwen Y U, Shi J, Song W. Mechanical Properties and Dynamic Mechanical Behavior for UHMWPE/SiO2 Nanocomposite Monofilament[J]. Materials Review, 2017, S1, 43-46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang W, Wang Y, Xia Y. Statistical dynamic tensile strength of UHMWPE-monofilaments[J]. Polymer, 2004, 45(11): 3729-3734. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chand N, Kreuzberger S, Hinrichsen G. Influence of processing conditions on the tensile properties of unidirectional UHMWPE fibre/LDPE composites[J]. Composites, 1994, 25(9): 878-880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alonso Y, Martini R E, Iannoni A, et al. Polyethylene/sepiolite monofilaments. Influence of drawing and nanofiller content on the crystal morphology and mechanical properties[J]. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2014, 56(8): 149-149. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mohammadalipour M, Masoomi M, Ahmadi M, et al. Interfacial shear strength characterization of GMA-grafted UHMWPE monofilament/epoxy/nano clay hybrid nanocomposite materials[J]. Rsc Advances, 2016, 6(48): 41793-41799. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu J R, Luan X N, Hu Z M, et al. Preparation and studies on the structure and properties of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/nano-SiO2 composite monofilaments[J]. Acta Polymerica Sinica, 2005, 1(5): 764-768. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yeh J T, Wang C K, Huang L K, et al. Ultradrawing and Ultimate Tenacity Properties of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composite Monofilaments Filled with Nanosilica Particles with Varying Specific Surface Areas[J]. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2015, (2015-9-30), 2015, 2015:1-16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan W, Ding Y, Tu Z, et al. Enhancement on ultimate tensile properties of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composite fibers filled with activated nanocarbon particles with varying specific surface areas[J]. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2015, (2015-9-30), 2015, 22:1-16. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallam M A, Cansfield D L M, Ward I M, et al. A study of the effect of molecular weight on the tensile strength of ultra-high modulus polyethylenes[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1986, 21(12): 4199-4205. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.