Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 132, 2019
XXII International Scientific Conference POLSITA 2019 “Progress of mechanical engineering supported by information technology”
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Earth and Environmental sciences
Published online 22 November 2019
  1. M. Borzecka-Walker, A. Faber, R. Pudelko, J. Kozyra, A. Syp, R. Borek, Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 9 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Brentrup, J. Küsters, H. Kuhlmann, J. Lammel, Eur. J. Agron. 20, 3 (2004a). [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Brentrup, J. Küsters, H. Kuhlmann, J. Lammel, Eur. J. Agron. 20, 3 (2004b). [Google Scholar]
  4. P.J. Ericksen, Ecol. Soc., 13, 2 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Foteinis, E. Chatzisymeon, J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Garnett, Food Policy, 36 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Gustavsson, C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. van Otterdijk, A. Meybeck, Global Food Losses and Food Waste Section 3.2 (Study conducted for the International Congress “Save Food at Interpack 2011, Düsseldorf, Germany) (FAO, Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Jakubowski, Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 45, 5 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Jakubowski, Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 47, 3 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A.E. Latawiec, L. Peake, H. Baxter, G. Cornelissen, K. Grotkiewicz, S. Hale, J.B. Krolczyk, M Kubon, A. Lopatka, A. Medynska-Juraszek, B. Reid, G. Siebielec, S.P Sohi, Z Spiak, B.B.N Strassburg, Reconnaissance-scale gis-based multicriteria decision analysis to support sustainable biochar use: Poland as a case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 25, 2 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. U. Malaga-Toboła, S. Tabor, S. Kocira, Productivity of resources and investments at selected ecological farms, w: Farm machinery and processes management in sustainable agriculture, 7th International Scientific Symposium / Huyghebaert Bruno, Lorencowicz Edmund, Uziak Jacek (red.), Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Mattsson, E. Wallén, Acta Horticulturae, 691 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Moll, D. Watson, Environmental pressures from European consumption and production - a study in integrated environmental and economic analysis ETC/SCP Working Paper 1/2009, 24 February 2009. European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, Copenhagen, DK (2009). [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Mouron, T. Nemecek, R.W. Scholz, O. Weber, Ecosystems and Environment, 114 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Notarnicola, S. Sala, A. Anton, S.J. McLaren, E. Saouter, U Sonesson, J. Clean. Prod., 140 (2017). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Roy, D. Nei, T. Orikasa, Q. Xu, H. Okadome, N. Nakamura, T. Shiina, J. Food Eng., 90, 1 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Sala, A. Anton, S. McLaren, B. Notarnicola, E. Saouter, U. Sonesson, J. Clean. Prod., 140, 2 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Shahmohammadi, H. Veisi, K. Khoshbakht, Energ. Ecol. Environ., 3, 5 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Sikora, M. Niemiec, A. Szeląg-Sikora, K. Mudryk, S. Kurpaska, H. Latała, J. Rorat. Evaluation of the properties of waste from African catfish (Clarias Gariepinus B.) farming in the context of using it for agricultural purposes, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Tylek, M. Pietrzykowski, J. Walczyk, T. Juliszewski, D. Kwaśniewski, Root Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 1, 38 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Willersinn, S. Möbius, P. Mouron, J. Lansche, G. Mack, J. Clean. Prod., 140, 2 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Zangeneh, M. Omid, A. Akram, A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran Energy, 35 (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.