Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2019
Innovative Technologies in Environmental Science and Education (ITESE-2019)
Article Number 04018
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Planning and Environmental Education
Published online 04 December 2019
  1. B. Algieri, An econometric estimation of the demand for tourism: The case of Russia. Tour. Econom. 12(1), pp. 5-20 (2006) doi: 10.5367/000000006776387114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Andrades, F. Dimanche, Destination competitiveness and tourism development in Russia: Issues and challenges. Tour. Manag. 62, pp. 360-376 (2017) doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.05.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.V. Nikolaeva, N.M. Bogoliubova, S.S. Shirin, Ecological tourism in the state image policy structure. Exp. and prob. of modern Russ. Curr. Iss. in Tour. 21(5), pp. 547-566 (2018) doi: 10.1080/13683500.2015.1100588 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Novelli, B. Schmitz, T. Spencer, Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience. Tour. Manag., 27(6), pp. 1141-1152 (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.11.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Alexandrova, Y. Vladimirov, Tourism clusters in Russia: What are their key features. The case of Vologda region. Worldwide Hosp. and Tour. Them. 8(3), pp. 346-358 (2016) doi: 10.1108/WHATT-02-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Kim, C. Shim, Social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation of smalland medium-sized enterprises in a tourism cluster. Int. J. of Cont. Hosp. Manag. 30(6), pp. 2417-2437 (2018) doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0392 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.-J. She, Y.-H. Zhu, Q. Huang, System of sustainable construction based on project whole life cycle management. Ad. Mat. Res. 403-408, pp. 2093-2097 (2012) doi: 10.4028/ [Google Scholar]
  8. M.M. Matar, M.E. Georgy, M.E. Ibrahim, Sustainable construction management: Introduction of the operational context space (OCS). Constr. Manag. and Ec. 26(3), pp. 261-275 (2008) doi: 10.1080/01446190701842972 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Conte, V. Monno, Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings. Envir. Imp. Ass. Rev. 34, pp. 31-40 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.12.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Baird, A. Leaman, J. Thompson, A comparison of the performance of sustainable buildings with conventional buildings from the point of view of the users. Arch. Scie. Rev. 55(2), pp. 135-144 (2012) doi: 10.1080/00038628.2012.670699 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Wang, H. Adeli, Sustainable building design. J. of Civ. Eng. and Manag. 20(1), pp. 1-10 (2014) doi: 10.3846/13923730.2013.871330 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L.V. Prykina, A.K. Orlov, Peculiar Features for the Consideration of Ecological and Economical Aspects of the Course of Underground Construction. Proc. Eng. 165, pp. 1388-1394 (2016) doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.869 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Meshcheryakova, Problems of the development of international standards of “green building” in Russia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth and Envir. Scie. 90(1), 012118 (2017) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012118 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Bernardi, S. Carlucci, C. Cornaro, R. A. Bohne, An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9(7), 1226 (2017) doi: 10.3390/su9071226 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R.K. Zimmermann, O. Skjelmose, K. G. Jensen, K. K. Jensen, H. Birgisdottir, Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mat. Scie. and Eng. 471(9), 092060 (2019) doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Vazquez, M. Miguez, L. Alves, J. Valente, G. Rossi, Certifications in construction: A case study comparing LEED and HQE . WIT Trans. on Ecol. and the Envir. 144, pp. 253-264 (2011) doi: 10.2495/ECO110231 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Kanafani, F.N. Rasmussen, R.K. Zimmermann, H. Birgisdottir, Adopting the EU Sustainable Performance Scheme Level(s) in the Danish Building Sector. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mat. Scie. and Eng. 471(9), 092070 (2019) doi: 10.1088/1757899X/471/9/09207 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H.J. Bernegger, New Portfolio-Rating-System based on LEVEL(S). IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth and Envir. Scie. 323(1), 012038 (2019) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012038 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Gluch, H. Baumann, The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: A conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build. and Envir. 39(5), pp. 571-580 (2004) doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Yan, Green construction economy research based on LCC theory. Open Cyb. and Syst. J. p, p. 2805-2810 (2015) 10.2174/1874110X01509012805 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Grabovy, A. Orlov, Management of the LCC considering industrial construction life cycle contracts. MATEC Web of Conf. 251, 05019 (2018) doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201825105019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Boateng, D. Ahiaga-Dagbui, Z. Chen, S. Ogunlana: Modelling economic risks in megaproject construction: A systemic approach. Proc.of the 31st Ann. Assoc. of Res. in Constr. Manag. Conf., ARCOM, pp. 115-124 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Hu, A.P.C. Chan, Y. Le, R.-Z. Jin, From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. J. of Manag. in Eng. 31(4), 4014052 (2015) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000254 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Flyvbjerg, What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Proj. Manag. J., 45 (2), pp. 6-19 (2014) doi: 10.1002/pmj.21409 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Orlov, Introduction of innovative technical solutions in construction on the basis of the concept of engineering. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mat. Science and Eng. 365(6), 062020 (2018) doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/6/062020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W.C. Kim, R. Mauborgne, Blue ocean leadership. Harv. Busin. Rev., 92 (5), pp. 60-68, 70, 72 passim. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  27. W.C. Kim, R. Mauborgne, Red ocean traps. Harv. Busin. Rev., pp. 1-7 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.