Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2019
Innovative Technologies in Environmental Science and Education (ITESE-2019)
Article Number 04068
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Planning and Environmental Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913504068
Published online 04 December 2019
  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK), Project Management Institute, USA. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Karakozova, Y. Prokhorova. THE FACTORS AFFECTING INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES AND COST MANAGEMENT MATEC Web of Conferences Volume 73, 11 August 2016, # 07015 15th International Conference on Topical Problems of Architecture, Civil Engineering, Energy Efficiency and Ecology, TPACEE 2016; Tyumen State University of Architecture and Civil Engineeringul. Lunacharskogo, 2Tyumen; Russian Federation; 27 April 2016 29 April 2016 (doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20167307015) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Karakozova, Y. Prokhorova. Organizational-economic mechanism of management of the cost of construction of the object in modern conditions. Economy and Entrepreneurship, # 2-1 (67-1), 609-612. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Karakozova, Y. Prochorova, Assessment of the efficiency of the decisions made during implementation of the investment project in construction. MATEC Web of Conferences Volume 193, 20 August 2018, # 050022018 International Scientific Conference Environmental Science for Construction Industry, ESCI 2018; Ho Chi Minh City; Viet Nam; 2 March 2018 go 5 March 2018 (doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305002) (2018) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Karnilov. Evaluation of the effectiveness of decisions taken in conditions of uncertainty, taking into account the time factor. Finance and credit # 13 (151), 54-57 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Stein., N. Taskaeva., T. Slepkova. Increase of the municipal land and property complex attractiveness on the basis of the development of cities infrastructure in Russia. MATEC Web of Conferences Cep. ^International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2016 «SMART City»», 08081 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Smith. Global Professional Standards for Project Cost Management Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 226, 14 July 2016, 124-131 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Francisco de Oliveira, R. RabechiniJr. Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management 37 (2019) 131-144 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. M. Rui, S. Ismail, M. Hussaini Professional Development of Project Management for Contractor in the Construction Project: A Review. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 174, 12 February 2015, 2940-2945 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Maddaloni, F., Davis, et al. The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35 (8), 1537-1556 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Mahmoudi, et al. A hybrid egalitarian bargaining game-DEA and sustainable network design approach for evaluating, selecting and scheduling urban road construction projects. Transportation Research Part E 130 (2019) 161-183 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aragones-Beltran, P., Garcia-Melon, M., Montesinos-Valera, J., How to assess stakeholders’ influence in project management A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35 (3), 451-462 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Analytic Network Process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35 (3), 451-462. Arashpour, M., Wakefield, R., Lee, E.W.M., Chan, R., Hosseini, M.R. Analysis of interacting uncertainties in on-site and off-site activities: implications for hybrid construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34 (7), 1393-1402 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ameyaw, E.E., Chan, A.P. A fuzzy approach for the allocation of risks in publiceprivate partnership water-infrastructure projects in developing countries. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (3), 04016016 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L.M. Khodeir, A. El Ghandour. Global professional standards for project cost management. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 10 (2019) 471-479 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.