EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 136 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 136 (2019) 03007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 136, 2019
2019 International Conference on Building Energy Conservation, Thermal Safety and Environmental Pollution Control (ICBTE 2019)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Energy Conservation Renovation of Green Buildings and Existing Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913603007
Published online 10 December 2019
  1. Shi Bin. Review and Prospect on the microstructure of clayey soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 1996, (1): 39-44. [Google Scholar]
  2. TU Xinbin, WANG Sijing. Particle shape descriptor in digital image analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(5): 659-662. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou Jian, Yu Rongchuan, Jia Mincai. Microstructure Parameters Measurement for Granular Soil Model Using Digital Image Technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(5): 659-662. [Google Scholar]
  4. James P Hyslip, Luis E. Vallejo. Fractal analysis of the roughnes sand size distribution of granular materials [J]. Engineering Geology, 1997, 48: 231-243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. ALTUHAFI F, OSULLIVAN C, CAVARRETTA I. Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(8):1290-1307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. YANG J, LUO X D. Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2015, 84:196-213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuo C Y, Fost J D, A Chameau J L. Image analysis determination of stereology based fabrictensors [J]. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(4):515-525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lu Haibo, Wang Nian, Zhao Yanlin, et al. Study of structure characteristics evolution of soft clay by pore size distribution test[J]. Rock and Soil Manchanics, 2011, 12(S1): 190-197. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiang Mingjing, Peng Licai, Zhu Hehua, et al. Microscopic investigation on shear band of marine clay in Zhuhai, China[J]. Rock and Soil Manchanics, 2011, 12(S1): 190-197. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu Haibo, Zhao Yanlin, Kong Lingwei, et al. DETERMINING PARAMETERS OF DAMAGE MODEL OF SOFT SOILS USING MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 768-777. [Google Scholar]
  11. ZENG Fan, HU Yongping, YANG Yi, et al. Particle technology of mineral processing[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology Press, 2001:19-20. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Qingbing, Xiang Wei, M Budhu. Study of particle shape quantification and effect on mechanical property of sand[J]. Rock and Soil Manchanics, 2011, 12(S1): 190-197. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu Shangwei, Yang Chunhe, Zhang Chao. Microscopic geometric characteristics of surface sedimentary tailings [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 768-777. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mandelbort B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M]. New York: [s.n.]. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  15. TIAN Kan-liang, ZHANG Hui-li, ZHANG Bo-ping, et al. Fractal structure of granularity distribution of natural sedimentary sandy gravel[J]. Journal of Northwest Science Technology University of Agriculture and Forest, 2002, 30(5): 85-89. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xie Heping. Fractal theory-Introduction to Rock Mechanics[M]. Beijing: The Science Publishing Company, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  17. CHEN Jiang-feng, WANG Zhen-fen, YAN Chun-zhong. Fractal description of roundness of clastic particles[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2002, 30(4): 16-17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen Haiyang, Wang Nian, Li Jianguo. Grain shape analysis of calcareous soil[J]. Rock and Soil Manchanics, 2005, 26(9):1389-1392 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.