EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 137 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 137 (2019) 01012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2019
XIV Research & Development in Power Engineering (RDPE 2019)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913701012
Published online 16 December 2019
  1. Bronk L., Czarnecki B., Magulski R., Elastycznosc krajowego systemu elektroenergetycznego, Raport Forum Energii, Elastycznosc krajowego systemu elektroenergetycznego, Raport Forum Energii, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. Green R., Vasilakos N., Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation, Energy Policy 38(7):3211–3220, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Macuk R., Mackowiak-Pandera J., likowska-Fyk A., Rubczynski A., Transformacja energetyczna w Polsce, Raport Forum Energii, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. Lefton S.A., Hilleman D., Make Your Plant Ready for Cycling Operations, Intertek-Aptech, www.powermag.com, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai H., Zhang N., Su W.A., A Literature Review of Stochastic Programming and Unit Commitment, Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 206–214, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biggar D., Hesamzadeh R., The Economics of Electricity Markets, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Arabas J., Mościcki M., Świrski K., Rozszerzenie zadania ekonomicznego rozdzialu obciążeń w warunkach rynku energii, Transition Technologies SA, www.cire.pl, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  8. Angerer M., Djukow M., Riedl K., Gleis S., Hartmut S., Simulation of Cogeneration-Combined Cycle Plant Flexibilization by Thermochemical Energy Storage, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 140(2, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. Rist J., Dias M., Palman M., Zelazo D., Cukurel B., Economic dispatch of a single micro-gas turbine under CHP operation, Applied Energy, Vol. 200, pp. 1–18, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. Papavasiliou A., He Y., Svoboda A., SelfCommitment of Combined Cycle Units Under Electricity Price Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 30, pp. 1690–1701, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Simoglou C., Biskas P., Bakirtzis A., Optimal SelfScheduling of a Thermal Producer in Short-Term Electricity Markets by MILP, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 25, pp. 1965–1977, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitra S., Sun L., Grossmann I., Optimal Scheduling of Industrial Combined Heat and Power Plants under Time-Sensitive Electricity Prices, Energy, Vol. 54, pp. 194–211, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li T., Shahidehpour M., Price-Based Unit Commitment: A Case of Lagrangian Relaxation Versus Mixed Integer Programming. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20, pp. 2015–2025, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lopez J., Gomez R., Guillen L., Practical commitment of combined cycle plants using dynamic programming. Proceedings of the 2010 Electrical Power and Energy Conference, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Alemany J., Moitre D., Pinto H., Magnago F., ShortTerm Scheduling of Combined Cycle Units Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming Solution, Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 5, pp. 161–170, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  16. Carrion M., Arroyo J.M., A Computationally Efficient Mixed-Integer Linear Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 21(3), (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. Ackooij W., Lopez I., Frangioni A., Lacalandra F., Tahanan M., Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey, Annals of Operations Research, Springer, Vol. 271, (1), pp. 11–85, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  18. Morales-Espana G., Latorre J., Ramos A., Tight and Compact MILP Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28(4), (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. Gulen S., Gas Turbines for Electric Power Generation, Cambridge University Press, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schroder A., Kunz F., Meiss J., Mendelevitch R., von Hirschhausen C., Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050, DIW Data Documentation, No. 68, Deutsches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. Ziolkowski P., Lemanski M., Badur J., Nastalek L., Power augmentation of PGE Gorzow’s gas turbine by steam injection - thermodynamic overview. Rynek Energii, Vol. 98, pp. 161–167, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Kehlhofer R., Rukes B., Hannemann F., Stirnimann F., Combined-Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants, PennWell Books(2009).. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chmielniak T., Lepszy S., Czaja D., Economic assessment of gas-steam systems taking account of variable loads, Journal of Power of Technologies, Vol. 95, pp. 54–62, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mikolajuk H., Duda M., Radović U., Skwierz S., Lewarski M., Kowal I., Aktualizacja analizy porównawczej kosztów wytwarzania energii elektrycznej w elektrowniach jądrowych, węglowych i gazowych oraz odnawialnych óródlach energii, Agencja Rynku Energii, Warszawa, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. Prina M., Fanali L., Manzolini G., Moser D., Sparber W., Incorporating combined cycle gas turbine flexibility constraints and additional costs into the EPLANopt model: The Italian case study, Energy, Vol. 160, pp. 33–43, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prina M., Fanali L., Manzolini G., Moser D., Sparber W., Incorporating combined cycle gas turbine flexibility constraints and additional costs into the EPLANopt model: The Italian case study, Energy, Vol. 160, pp. 33–43, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marquant J., Evins R., Carmeliet J., Reducing Computation Time with a Rolling Horizon Approach Applied to a MILP Formulation of Multiple Urban Energy Hub System, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 51, pp. 2137–2146, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  28. Agora Energiewende, Flexibility in thermal power plants - With a focus on existing coal-fired power plants, (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.