EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 137 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 137 (2019) 01037 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2019
XIV Research & Development in Power Engineering (RDPE 2019)
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913701037
Published online 16 December 2019
  1. J. Devlin, K. Li, P. Higgins, A. Foley, Gas generation and wind power: A review of unlikely allies in the United Kingdom and Ireland, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70 (2017) 757–768. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Gimeno-Gutiérrez, R. Lacal-Arántegui, Assessment of the European potential for pumped hydropower energy storage based on two existing reservoirs, Renew. Energy. 75 (2015) 856–868. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.068. [Google Scholar]
  3. IEA, World Energy Outlook 2018, Paris, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. M.C. Argyrou, P. Christodoulides, S.A. Kalogirou, Energy storage for electricity generation and related processes: Technologies appraisal and grid scale applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 94 (2018) 804–821. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D.A. Katsaprakakis, D.G. Christakis, I. Stefanakis, P. Spanos, N. Stefanakis, Technical details regarding the design, the construction and the operation of seawater pumped storage systems, Energy. 55 (2013) 619–630. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W.F. Pickard, The history, present state, and future prospects of underground pumped hydro for massive energy storage, Proc. IEEE. 100 (2012) 473–483. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2126030. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Luo, J. Wang, M. Dooner, J. Clarke, Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation, Appl. Energy. 137 (2015) 511–536. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Budt, D. Wolf, R. Span, J. Yan, A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments, Appl. Energy. 170 (2016) 250–268. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.108. [Google Scholar]
  9. A.J. Pimm, S.D. Garvey, M. de Jong, Design and testing of Energy Bags for underwater compressed air energy storage, Energy. 66 (2014) 496–508. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. He, J. Wang, Optimal selection of air expansion machine in Compressed Air Energy Storage: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 87 (2018) 77–95. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.01.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Morgan, S. Nelmes, E. Gibson, G. Brett, Liquid air energy storage - Analysis and first results from a pilot scale demonstration plant, Appl. Energy. 137 (2015) 845–853. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.109. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Tafone, E. Borri, G. Comodi, M. van den Broek, A. Romagnoli, Liquid Air Energy Storage performance enhancement by means of Organic Rankine Cycle and Absorption Chiller, Appl. Energy. 228 (2018) 1810–1821. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.133. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Wang, P. Zhao, Y. Yang, Y. Dai, Performance analysis of energy storage system based on liquid carbon dioxide with different configurations, Energy. 93 (2015) 1931–1942. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Dunn, H. Kamath, J.-M. Tarascon, Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices, Science (80-. ). 334 (2011) 928–935. doi:10.1126/science.1212741. [Google Scholar]
  15. A.B. Gallo, J.R. Simões-Moreira, H.K.M. Costa, M.M. Santos, E. Moutinho dos Santos, Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65 (2016) 800–822. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.028. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Benato, A. Stoppato, Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage: A technology overview, Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 6 (2018) 301–315. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. GME (Italian energy market operator), Italian Day-ahead energy market prices, (2019). https://www.mercatoelettrico.org/it/download/DatiStorici.aspx (accessed September 1, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Zakeri, S. Syri, Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 569–596. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A.J. Pimm, S.D. Garvey, M. de Jong, Design and testing of Energy Bags for underwater compressed air energy storage, Energy. 66 (2014) 496–508. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Smallbone, V. Jülch, R. Wardle, A.P. Roskilly, Levelised Cost of Storage for Pumped Heat Energy Storage in comparison with other energy storage technologies, Energy Convers. Manag. 152 (2017) 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.047. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Staub, P. Bazan, K. Braimakis, D. Müller, C. Regensburger, D. Scharrer, B. Schmitt, D. Steger, R. German, S. Karellas, M. Pruckner, E. Schlücker, S. Will, J. Karl, Reversible heat pump-organic rankine cycle systems for the storage of renewable electricity, Energies. 11 (2018). doi:10.3390/en11061352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Morandin, M. Mercangöz, J. Hemrle, F. Maréchal, D. Favrat, Thermoeconomic design optimization of a thermo-electric energy storage system based on transcritical CO2 cycles, Energy. 58 (2013) 571–587. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Henchoz, F. Buchter, D. Favrat, M. Morandin, M. Mercangöz, Thermoeconomic analysis of a solar enhanced energy storage concept based on thermodynamic cycles, Energy. 45 (2012) 358–365. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D.H. Doughty, P.C. Butler, A.A. Akhil, N.H. Clark, J.D. Boyes, Stationary Electrical Energy Storage, Electrochem. Soc. Interface. 19 (2010) 49–53. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.