EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 140 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 140 (2019) 08014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 140, 2019
International Scientific Conference on Energy, Environmental and Construction Engineering (EECE-2019)
Article Number 08014
Number of page(s) 4
Section Innovative Technologies for Technosphere Safety
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201914008014
Published online 18 December 2019
  1. A.Z. Mendiburu, J.A. de CarvalhoJr, C.R. Coronado, Method for determination of flammability limits of gaseous compounds diluted with N2 and CO2 in air Fuel, 226, 65-80 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Casal, Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents in Industrial Plants: Second Edition, 1-553 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. I.V. Yegorova, H.H. Petrenko, N.B. Rudepko, H.H. Gracheva, Consequences assessment of emergency explosions of fuel-air mixtures at enterprises of the full power complex, 3 (35) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Kempna, J. Smolka, M. Kvarcak, I. Kricfalusi, Z. Stejskal, T. Hozjan, D. Kolaitis, Fire Safety Protection Assessment of Industrial Technologies, J. of Physics: Conference Series, 1107 (4), 042036 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Nikulin, A.Y. Nikulina, Assessment of occupational health and safety effectiveness at a mining company. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 23 (1), 351-355 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. L.I. Ushvitskii, T.A. Kulagovskaya, A.A. Ter-Grigor’yants, I.V. Solovyova, E.S. Mezentseva, Methodological tools for risk assessment in industrial enterprises, International J. of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (4), 1011-1016 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Bryukhan, I. Lavrusevich, A. Vinogradov, I. Vinogradov, Consideration of external natural impacts in the design of hazardous production facilities M.: Web of Conferences, 251, 06001 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Redutskiy, Optimization of Safety Instrumented System Design and Maintenance Frequency for Oil and Gas Industry Processes, Management and Production Engineering Review, 8 (1), 46-59 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Khakzad, Which Fire to Extinguish First? A Risk-Informed Approach to Emergency Response in Oil Terminals Risk Analysis, 38 (7), 1444-1454 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Tang, J. Jing, Z. Zhang, Y. Yang, A quantitative risk analysis method for the high hazard mechanical system in petroleum and petrochemical industry, Energies, 11 (1) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Tzenova, Calculation of individual risk and social risk in accident situations in industrial production, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2048 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.V. Matveev, A.V. Maksimov, O.V. Shcherbakov, A.S. Smirnov, Method of estimation for the reliability of quantitative risk analysis on objects of oil and gas industry. Pozharovzryvo-bezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 27 (1), 35-49 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Maria Gligor, V. Petrescu, Considerations on determining the explosion risk and the areas with explosion hazard in a natural gas compressor station, M.: Web of Conferences, 184, 03005 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.G. Alexeev, L.V. Poluyan, E.S. Gur’ev, N.M. Barbin, Methods of Predicting Vapor Cloud Exp1losions in Enclosed Spaces, Coke and Chemistry, 61 (8), 312-317 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S.V. Burtsev, O.Ph. Basyrov, Integrated approach in the field of industrial safety and labour protection Ugol’, (4), 26-30 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. R.D. Jovanovic, K. Strug, B. Swiatkowski, S. Kakietek, K. Jagiello, D.B. Cvetinovic, Experimental and numerical investigation of flame characteristics during swirl burner operation under conventional and oxy-fuel conditions, Thermal Science, 21 (3), 1463-1477 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Zhang, Analysis of Fire Safety System for Storage Enterprises of Dangerous Chemicals, Procedia Engineering, 211, 986-995 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. I.V. Orishchenko, N.V. Petrenko, V.N. Litvinov, N.N. Gracheva, N.B. Rudenko, Information systems and processes in the tasks implementation of assessing the consequences of the fuel mixture emergency explosions, 193-204 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Arefiev, M. Mikhalev, D. Zotov, K. Zotov, N. Vatin, O. Nikonova, O. Skvortsova, S. Pavlov, T. Chashina, T. Kuchurina, V. Terleev, V. Badenko, Y. Volkova, V. Salikov, K. Strelets, M. Petrochenko, A. Rechinsky, Physical modeling of suspended sediment deposition in marine intakes of nuclear power plants, Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 32-38 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Marshall, Major chemicals hazards: translated from English. M.: World, 672 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. M. Kozlitin, Development of the theory and methods of risk assessment for ensuring industrial safety of oil and gas facilities [Electronic resource]: Dis. Dr. techn. Sciences: 05.26.03. Saratov: RSL (From the funds of the Russian State Library) (2006) [Google Scholar]
  22. G.P. Demidenko, Protection of objects of national economy from weapons of mass destruction, 287 (Orlov, Kiev) (1989) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.N. Birbraer, Extreme effects on facilities, 594 (SPb.: Ed. Polytechnic University, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  24. State standard 12.3.047-2012. Fire safety of technological processes. General requirements. Control methods. [Google Scholar]
  25. Federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety “General rules of explosion safety for explosive chemical, petrochemical and oil refining industries” [Google Scholar]
  26. Safety guide “Methodology for assessing the consequences of accidental explosions for fuel-air mixtures” [Google Scholar]
  27. M.Yu. Zemenkova, Y.D. Zemenkov, A.L. Pimnev, E.V. Kurushina, System of Controlling the Reliability of Hydraulic Machinery in Oil and Gas Facilities, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 127 (1) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Stankovic, S. Petelin, P. Vidmar, M. Perkovic, Influence of implementation of technologically advanced evacuation models on the process of decreasing the risk during accidents in an LNG terminal, Transport Problems, 12 (1), 25-38 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Qiao, A Quantitative Individual Risk Assessment Method in Process Facilities with Toxic Gas Release Hazards: A Combined Scenario Set and CFD Approach, Process Safety Progress, 38 (1), 52-60 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.