Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 140, 2019
International Scientific Conference on Energy, Environmental and Construction Engineering (EECE-2019)
Article Number 11002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Renewable Energy
Published online 18 December 2019
  1. Guidelines for sanitary and recreational activities. Appendix 2 to the order of Rosleskhoz 523, 32 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. S.P. Karpachev, R.I. Diev, Modelirovanie tekhnologicheskogo protsessa uborki zakhlamlennosti lesa portativnoy lebedkoy [Modeling of technological processes of cleaning litter the forest with portable winch]. Lesnoy vestnik / Forestry Bulletin, 21, 4, 10–14. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2017-4-10-14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. S.P. Karpachev, R.I. Diev, Wood Harvesting Technology Development of Natural Losses for Bio-Energy Needs. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Aria 3(237), 41-43 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. S.P. Karpachev, R.I. Diev Process Simulation of Wood Mortality Cleaning for Needs of Bioenergetics. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Aria 6(240), 46-48 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. G.R. Bailey, An evaluation of the line-intersect method of assessing logging residue. In-form. Rep. VP-X-23, Can. Dep. Fisch. Forest, Forest Prod., Lab., Vancouver, B.C., 36 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  6. G.R. Bailey, 1970, A simplified method of sampling logging residue. Forest. Chron. 46(4), 288–294 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G.R. Bailey, E.L. Lefebvre, Estimating volume distributions of logging residue from intersect-sampled data. Bi-Mon. Res. Notes 27, 4–5 (1971) [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Bate, T. Torgersen, M. Wisdom, E. Garton, Biased estimation of forest log characteristic using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology and Managment 258(5), 635-640 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Bell, A. Kerr, D. McNickle, R. Woollons, Accuracy of the line intersect method of post-logging sampling under orientation bias. Forest Ecology and Management 84(1), 23–28 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.K. Brown, Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA For. Servo Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16 24 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  11. J.K. Brown, P.J. Roussopoulos, Eliminating biases in the planar intersect method for estimating volumes of small fuels. For. Sci. 20, 350–356 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Dalkey, H. Olaf, An Experimental Application ofthe Delphi Method to the use of experts. Management Science 9(3), 458–467 doi, 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 (1963) [Google Scholar]
  13. P.G. De Vries, A general theory on line intersect sampling with application to logging residue inventory. Madelingen Landbouw Hogeschool. 73-11, Wageningen, Netherlands, 23 (1973) [Google Scholar]
  14. P.G. De Vries, Multistage line intersect sampling. Forest Sci. 20(2), 129–134 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  15. P.G. De Vries, 1979, Line Intersect Sampling, Statistical Theory, Applications and Suggestions for Extended Use in Ecological Inventory. In Sampling Biological Populations. Editors G.M. Cormack, G.P. Patil, and D.S. Robson. International Coop. Publishing House. Fairland, Mary-land, Statistical Ecology Series, 5, 1–77 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  16. P.G. De Vries, Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.R. Ghaffariyan, Remaining slash in different harvesting operation sites in Australian plantations. Silva Balcanica 14(1), 83–93 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. J.W. Hazard, S. G. Pickford, Cost Functions for the Line Intersect Method of Sampling Forest Residue in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14(1), 57–62 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.W. Hazard, S.G. Pickford, Simulation studies on line intersect sampling of forest residue. Part II. Forest Sci. 32(2), 447–470 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.O. Howard, F.R. Ward, Measurement of logging residue – alternative applications of the line intersect method. USDA Forest Serv. Res Note PNW-183, Pac Northwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oregon, 8 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  21. S.P. Karpachev, Quantitative estimation of the environmental impact of the traditional use of forest rivers for floating timber transport, estimating of the volume of sunken timber in rivers. Session 013, XXII IUFRO World Congress. Forests in the Balance, Linking Tradition and Technol-ogy, 8 – 13 August (2005) [Google Scholar]
  22. S.P. Karpachev, The quantitative estimation of the rest residuals as biomass to produce bioenergy for local industry and villages in forest regions of Russia. Proceedings World Bioenergy, The Swedish Bioenergy Association, Svebio, Torsgatan 12, SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden, ISBN, 978-91-977624-0-3, 408–410 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. S.P. Karpachev, The quantitative estimation of the forest residuals as biomass for bio-energy for local industry and villages in forest regions of Russia. FORMEC. 41. International Symposium in Schmallenberg, Germany 02 – 05 June, ISBN, 978-3-9811335-2-3, Gross-Umstadt, 51–56 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  24. S.P. Karpachev, Operative Method for Quantitative and Qualitative Estimation of Forest Residuals After Harvesting Logging Operations as Biomass for Bioenergy, Bioenergy, Sustainable Bioenergy Business, 4th International Bioenergy Conference and Exhibition, 31. August to 4. September. Available at, http// (2009) [Google Scholar]
  25. S.P. Karpachev, V.I. Zaprudnov, M.A. Bykovskiy, E.N. Scherbakov, Quantitative Estimation of Logging Residues by Line-Intersect Method. Croatian journal of forest engineering. 38, 1, 33-45 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. A.F. Linnel Nemec, G. Davis Efficient of six line intersect sampling designs for estimation volume and density of coarse woody debris. Nanaimo, Forest Service British Columbia, Technical Report (2002) [Google Scholar]
  27. P.L. Marshall, G. Davis, V.M. LeMay, Using Line Intersect Sampling for Coarse Woody Debris. Technical ReportTR-003 March, Research Section, Vancouver Forest Region, BCMOF, 34 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. O’Hehir, J. Leech, Logging residue assessment byline intersect sampling. Australian Forestry 60(3), 196–201 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S.G. Pickford, S.W. Hazard, 1978, Simulation studies on line intersect sampling of forest residue. Forest Sci. 24(4), 469–483 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  30. C.E. Van Wagner, The line-intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Sci. 14(1), 20–26 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  31. C.E. Van Wagner, Diameter measurement in the line intersect method. Forest Sci. 22(2), 230–232 (1976) [Google Scholar]
  32. C.E. Van Wagner, Practical Aspects of the Line Intersect Method. Information Report PI-X-12. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forest Service, 11 (1982) [Google Scholar]
  33. W.G. Warren, P.F. Olsen, A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste. Forest Sci. 10(3), 267–276 (1964) [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Woldendorp, R. Keenan, S. Barry, R. Spencer, Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology and Management 198(1), 133–148 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  35. S.P. Karpachev, M.A. Bykovskiy, Simulation modelling of the felling-bunching machine logging operation with the multiple-tree accumulating head, IOP Conf. Ser., Earth Environ. Sci. 226 012021. https// (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.