EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 143 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 143 (2020) 02043 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2020
2nd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2019)
Article Number 02043
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental Science and Energy Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014302043
Published online 24 January 2020
  1. ZHAI X, LI Z, HUANG B, et al. Remediation of multiple heavy metal-contaminated soil washing and in suit immobilization [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 635: 92-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. ZHANG J, WANG L H, YANG J C, et al. Health risk to residents and stimulation to inherent bacteria of various heavy metals in soil [J].Science of the total environment, 2015, 508(1): 29-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. LI W. Research status of remediation technology for heavy metal contaminated soil [J]. Guangdong chemical industry, 2019, 46 (10): 140-141. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cong Zhang, Xian Zhang. Research progress of remediation technology of heavy metal pollution in soil [J]. Environment and development, 2018, 2: 87-89. [Google Scholar]
  5. Weikang Yao, Zongping Cai, Shuiyu sun, et al. Research progress in enhanced electric remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil [J]. Environmental pollution and control, 2019, 46 (8): 979-983. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hans F Stroo, Leeson Andrea Marqusee, Jeffrey A, et al. Chlorinated ethene source remediation: Lessons learned [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(12):6438-6447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mark Sh Mak, Lo Irene Mc.Environmental life cycle assessment of permeable reactive barriers: Effects of construction methods, reactive materials and groundwater constituents [J]. Environmental Science ＆ Technology, 2011, 45(23):10148-10154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yan Ma, Du Xiaoming, Shi Yi, et al. Lowconcentration tailing and subsequent quicklimeenhanced remediation of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated soils by mechanical soil aeration [J].Chemosphere, 2015, 121:117-123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hairong Wang, Kim Bojeong, Wunder Stephanie L. Nanoparticle supported lipid bilayers as an in situ remediation strategy for hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils [J].Environmental Science ＆ Technology, 2015, 49(1):529-536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jing Zhang, Zhang Guilong, Cai Dongqing, et al. Immediate remediation of heavy metal [Cr(VI)] contaminated soil by high energy electron beam irradiation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 285:208-211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill R T, Harbottle M J, Smith J W N, et al. Electrokinetic enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants: A review of processes and environmental applications [J].Chemosphere, 2014, 107:31-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baek K, Kim B, Ko S, et al. Research and field experiences on electrokinetic remediation in South Korea [J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 79(2):116-123. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shariatmadari N, Weng C H, Daryaee H. Enhancement of hexavalent chromium [Cr(Ⅵ)] remediation from clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with a nano-sized zero-valent iron barrier.[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2009, 26(6):1071-1079. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chung H I, Lee M H. A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52(10):3427-3431. [Google Scholar]
  15. Saeedi M, Gharehtapeh M. Effect of Alternative Electrolytes on Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation ofnHexavalent Chromium in Clayey Soi1 [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2013, 7(1):39-50. [Google Scholar]
  16. Weng C H, Lin T Y, Chu S H, et al. Laboratory-Scale Evaluation of Cr(VI) Removal from Clay by Electrokinetics Incorporated with Fe0 Barrier [J]. Practice Periodical of Hazardous Toxic & Radioactive Waste Management, 2006, 10(3):171-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hongtao Hu. Experimental closure of electrokinetic and osmotic reaction grids for remediation of tin contaminated groundwater [J]. Journal of environmental engineering, 2009, 3 (10): 1773-1777. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung Ha Ik, Lee Myungho. A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52 (10): 3427-3431. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ching Yuan, Chiang Tzu Shing. The mechanisms of arsenic removal from soil by electrokinetic process coupled with iron permeable reaction barrier [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 67(8):1533-1542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wan Jinzhong, Li Zhirong, Lu Xiaohua, et al. Remediation of a hexachlorobenzenecontaminated soil by surfactant-enhanced electrokinetics coupled with microscale Pd/Fe PRB [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 184(1/3):184-190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jinzhong Yang. Remediation of soil polluted by 1, 1, 2, 2-tetrachlorohexane by electrodynamic - Fenton Method and catalytic iron powder barrier composite technology [C]. Proceedings of the 17th Taiwan waste treatment technology symposium, Taiwan, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mena E, Villasenor J, Canizares P, et al. Influence of electric field on the remediation of polluted soil using a biobarrier assisted electro-bioremediation process [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 190:294-304. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xuanfei Liao. Study on the removal of trichloroethylene from water by zero valent iron reaction wall with external voltage. Taoyuan: National Central University, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  24. Youchang Liu. New electrokinetic technology and its application in remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil [D]. Chongqing University, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jing Yuan, Lisheng Zhang. Treatment of tetrachloroethylene contaminated clay by electrodynamic technology combined with Fe0 reaction barrier: the effect of potential gradient and treatment time [C]. The second symposium on Soil and groundwater treatment technology in Taiwan. Tainan: Success University Press, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rihang Zhang, Shufen Cheng, Peijun Lin. Remediation of tetrachloroethylene contaminated soil by zero valent iron and electrodynamic method [D]. Taichung: Chaoyang University of science and technology, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chew C F, Zhang T C.In-Situ Remediation of Nitrate-Contaminated Ground Water by Eemediation of Nitrae-Contaminated Ground Water by Electrokinetic/Iron barrier Processes[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1998, 38(7): 135-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tasuma Suzuki, Oyama Yukinori, Moribe Mai, et al. An electrokinetic/Fe0 permeable reactive barrier system for the treatment of nitratecontaminated subsurface soils [J].Water Research, 2012, 46(3):772-778. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Xiaolan. Study on the treatment of nitrate bearing soil with nano iron powder and electrodynamic method [D]. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen University, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hui Gong. Study on the harm and treatment of nitrate in groundwater [J]. Water Conservancy Technical Supervision, 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.