Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 148, 2020
The 6th Environmental Technology and Management Conference (ETMC) in conjunction with The 12th AUN/SEED-Net Regional Conference on Environmental Engineering (RC EnvE) 2019
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Waste to Energy and Resources
Published online 05 February 2020
  1. Mshandete, A. M., & Parawira, W. (2009). Biogas technology research in selected sub-Saharan African countries - A review. African Journal of Biotechnology , 8 (2), 116-25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Salihu, A., & Alam, M. Z. (2012). Palm oil mill effluent: a waste or a raw material? Journal of Applied Sciences Research , 8 (1), 466-73 [Google Scholar]
  3. Tree Crop Estate Statistic of Indonesia, Palm oil Indonesia (2016) Area and Palm Oil Production of Smallholder By Province and Tree Crop Classification 9 – 18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed, Y., Yaakob, Z., Akhtar, P., & Sopian, K. (2015). Production of biogas and performance evaluation of existing treatment processes in palm oil mill effluent (POME). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 42, 1260-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schuchardt, F., Wulfert, K., Darnoko, D., & Herawan, T. (2007). Effect of new palm oil mill processes on the EFB and POME utilisation. Proceedings of Chemistry and Technology Conference PIPOC 2007, (pp. 44-57). Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]
  6. A-Shorgani, N.K.N., Shukor, H., Abdeshahian, P., Yusuf, M., Nazir, M., Kalil, M.S., Hamid, A.A., Mohtar, W., Yusoff, W., Process optimization of butanol production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 (ATCC 13564) using palm oil mill effluent in acetone– butanol– ethanol fermentation, Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 4, pp. 244-249, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ji, C M and Poh, P E., Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME) : Opportunities and challenges from Malaysia’s perspective, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, pp. 717-726, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Salihu, A and Alam, M., Palm oil mill effluent: a waste or a raw material?, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1, pp. 466-473, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Demirel, B and Scherer, The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review, Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 7, pp. 173-190, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Suzuki, K., & Maekawa, T. (2003): Uptake and mass balance of trace metals for methane producing bacteria. Biomass and Bioenergy (25), 427-433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, L., Zhou, Q., & Li, F. (2006): Avoiding propionic acid accumulation in the anaerobic process for biohydrogen production. Biomass and Bioenergy (30), 177-182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, X. J., Ren, N. Q., Xiang, W. S., & Guo, W. Q. (2007): Influence of gaseous end-products inhibition and nutrient limitations on the growth and hydrogen production by hydrogen-producing fermentative bacterial B49. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (32), 748-754 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu, H.Q., dan Fang, H.H.P., 2003. Acidogenesis of Gelatin-rich Wastewater in an up flow Anaerobic Reactor: Influence of pH and Temperature. Water Research, (37):55–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ren, N., Wang, B., & Huang, J. C. (1997): Ethanol-type fermentation from carbohydrate in high rate acidogenic reactor. Biotechnology Bioengineering, 54(5), 428-433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ren, N.Q., Xing, D., Rittmann, B.E., Zhao, L., Xie, T., dan Zhao, X., 2007. Microbial Community Structure of Ethanol Type Fermentation in Bio-hydrogen Production. Environmental Microbiology, 9(5):1112–1125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ren, N.Q., Chua, H., Chan, S.Y., Tsang, Y.F., Wang, Y.J., dan Sin, N., 2006. Assessing Optimal Fermentation Type for Bio-hydrogen Production in Continuous-Flow Acidogenic Reactors. Bioresource Technology, 98(9): 1774-1780. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han, S.K., Kim. H.S., Sung, S., dan Shin, H.S., 2003. Effect of pH and Repeated Heat-Shock Treatment on Hydrogen Fermentation of Sucrose by a Mixed Culture. Env. Eng. Res. Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. 8(4):202-211. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, X., Li, Y., Duan, Y., Shi, Z., dan Mao, Z., 2003. A Novel, Repeated Fed-Batch, Ethanol Production System with Extremely Long-Term Stability Achieved by Fully Recycling Fermented Supernatants, Biotechnology Letters, 25:1819-1826. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Temudo, M.F., Poldermans, R., Kleerebezem, R., dan van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., 2008. Glycerol Fermentation by (Open) Mixed Cultures: A Chemostat Study. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 100(6):1088-1098. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fang, H.H.P., dan Liu, H., 2002. Effect of pH on Hydrogen Production from Glukosa by a Mixed Culture. Bioresource Technology, 82:87-93 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. APHA, AWWA, WEF. (2012). Standard Method for the Examination Water and Wastewater (22nd Edition). Washington DC, United States of America: American Public Health Association. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cao, W. & Liu, R. (2012). Screening and optimization of trace elements supplement in sweet sorghum juice for ethanol production. Biomass and bioenergy, 50,45-51 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ohimain, E. I., & Izah, S. C. (2017). A review of biogas production from palm oil mill effluents using different configurations of bioreactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 70, 242-253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Elreedy, A., Tawfik, A., Enitan, A., Kumari, S., dan Bux, F. (2016): Pathways of 3-biofules (hydrogen, ethanol and methane) production from petrochemical industry wastewater via anaerobic packed bed baffled reactor inoculated with mixed culture bacteria, Energy Conversion and Management, 122, 119-130. [Google Scholar]
  25. Handajani, Gumilar, A., M., Syafila, M., Ethanol producion from the conversion of palm oil mill effluent by anaerobic process: Influence of iron (II) addition for acidogenic product formation, International Seminar of “NIT, Gifu College” and Partner Universities – Environmental Sustainability, Disaster Prevention and Reduction, and Engineering Education. Gifu, Japan (March 18th – 19th 2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.