Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 150, 2020
The Seventh International Congress “Water, Waste and Environment” (EDE7-2019)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Natural Resources Management
Published online 12 February 2020
  1. TOUIJRATE S BABA K AHATRI M and BAHI L 2018. The Liquefaction Potential Of Sandy Silt Layers Using CPT Tests: Case Study From The Casablanca—Tangier High-Speed Rail Line (LGV) In Morocco, International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology(IJCIET)-Scopus Indexed. Volume:9,Issue:10,Pages:1644–1656. [Google Scholar]
  2. TOUIJRATE S BABA K AHATRI M and BAHI L. Validation and Verification of Semi-Empirical Methods for Evaluating Liquefaction Using Finite Element Method, MATEC Web of Conferences 149, 02028 (2018), doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201814902028, CMSS-2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. JUANG H YUAN H LEE D and LIN P (2003). Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 129(1), 66—80 [Google Scholar]
  4. OLSEN R.S (1997). Cyclic liquefaction based on the cone penetrometer test. In: Youd T.L, Idriss I.M, editors. Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Technical Report NCEER-97-0022, Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997. p. 225–276. [Google Scholar]
  5. ROBERTSON P.K and WRIDE C.E (1998). Evaluating Cyclic Liquefaction Potential Using the Cone Penetration Test, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(3), pp 442–459 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. IDRISS I.M BOULANGER R.W. In: Doolin D, editor. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Proc., 11th International conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, and 3rd International conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, vol. 1. Stallion Press; 2004. p. 32–56 [Google Scholar]
  7. Youd T IDRISS I.M ANDRUS R.D ARANGO I CASTRO G and CHISTIAN J.T (2001). Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(10) [Google Scholar]
  8. ISHIBASHI I and ZHANG X (1993). Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand clay. Soils and Foundations, 33 No 1, 182—191 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. DOBRY R and LADD R (1980). Discussion to ““Soil Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evaluation for Level Ground During Earthquakes,”“ by H. B. Seed and ““Liquefaction Potential: Science versus Practice,”“ by R. B, Peck, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, GT. 6, June, pp. 720–724 [Google Scholar]
  10. NEMAT N.S et SHOKOOH A (1979). Une Approche Unifiée à densification et Liquéfaction de Sable sans cohésion dans la taille cyclique, Journal Géotechnique canadien, Vol. 16, pp 659–678 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. SEED H.B and IDRISS I.M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil Liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div, ASCE 1971; 97(SM9):1249–73 [Google Scholar]
  12. CHEN C.J JUANG C.H 2000. Calibration of SPT- and CPT-based liquefaction evaluation methods. In: Mayne, P.W., Hryciw, R. (Eds.) Innovations and Applications in Geotechnical Site Characterization. Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 97. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 49–64 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. DAVIS R.O and BERRILL J.B (1982). Energy dissipation and Seismic liquefaction in sands, Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, Vol 10, pp.59–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. BENNANI et BENTAYEB A. Aménagement hydro- agricole du bassin cotier Darader- Souiere, 21–44, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  15. BOULANGER R.W IDRISS I.M. State normalization of penetration resistance and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance, Proc., 11th International Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA,2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. SEED H.B TOKIMATSU K HARDER Jr.L.F CHUNG R The Influence of SPT Procedures on Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations, Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1984 [Google Scholar]
  17. SEED H.B TOKIMATSU K HARDER Jr.L.F CHUNG R. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 1985;111(12):1425–45 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. SEED H.B MORI K CHAN C.K. Influence of Seismic History on the Liquefaction Characteristics of Sands, Report No. EERC 75-25, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, August 1975 [Google Scholar]
  19. KIZSHIDA H. Damage to reinforced concrete buildings in Niigata city with special reference to foundation engineering - soil and foundation, Tokyo,vol,VI, N°1, 71–88 [Google Scholar]
  20. KOISUMI Y. Change in density of sand subsoil case by the Niigata earthquake -soil and foundation, Tokyo, vol,VI, N°2,PP,38–44 [Google Scholar]
  21. AHATRI M BABA K TOUIJRATE K and BAHI L. MATEC Web of Conferences 149, 02041 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. AHATRI M BABA K TOUIJRATE K and BAHI L. The Influence of Spectral Responses on the Structures Heights, Proceedings of the 2nd GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, Egypt 2018 - The Official International Congress of the Soil-Structure Interaction Group in Egypt (SSIGE), Advances and Challenges in Structural Engineering pp 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  23. AHATRI M BABA K TOUIJRATE S and BAHI L 2018. The Seismic Motion Parameters Effects On Response Spectra: Comparison Between El Centro 1940 And Imperial Valley 1979 Earthquakes, International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET) - Scopus Indexed.Volume:9, Issue: 10, Pages: 1610–1618. [Google Scholar]
  24. GONIN H VANDANGEON P LAFEUILLADE M.P. Etude sur les corrélations entre le standard et le pressiomètre penetration test, Rev. Franç. Géotech. ho 58, pp. 67–78 fianvier L992). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.