Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 152, 2020
2019 International Conference on Power, Energy and Electrical Engineering (PEEE 2019)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02009 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Renewable Energy and Energy Engineering | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015202009 | |
Published online | 14 February 2020 |
- Y. Yao, Y. Hu, S. Gao, G. Yang, J. Du, A multipurpose dual-axis solar tracker with two tracking strategies, Ren. Ene., 72, 98 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- S. Abdallah S. Nijmeh, Two axes sun tracking system with PLC control, Ene. Cons. Manag., 45, 1939 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- A. Al-Mohamad, Efficiency improvements of photovoltaic panels using a Sun-tracking system, Appl. Ene., 79, 354 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- O. Asowata, J. Swart, C. PienaarR. Schoeman, Optimum Tilt Angles for Photovoltaic Panels during Winter Months in the Vaal Triangle, S.A., (2012) [Google Scholar]
- N. AL-Rousan, N. A. M. Isa, M. K. M. Desa, Advances in solar photovoltaic tracking systems, Ren. Sus. Ene. Rev., 82, 2569 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- V. Sumathi, R. Jayapragash, A. Bakshi, P. Kumar, Solar tracking methods to maximize PV system output Ren. Sus. Ene. Rev., 74, 38 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- M. Serhan L. EL-Chaar, Two Axes Sun Tracking System: Comparsion with a Fixed System, Ren. Ene. Power Qual. J., 1, 84 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- R. G. Vieira, F. K. O. M. V. Guerra, M. R. B. G. Vale, M.M. Araújo, Comparative performance analysis between static solar panels and single-axis tracking system on a hot climate region near to the equator, Ren. Sus. Ene. Rev., 64, 681 (2016) [Google Scholar]
- M. M. Abu-Khader, O. O. Badran, S. Abdallah, Evaluating multi-axes sun-tracking system at different modes of operation in Jordan, Ren. Sus. Ene. Rev., 12, 873 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- H. J. Vermaak, Techno-economic analysis of solar tracking systems in S.A., Ene. Proc., 61, 2438 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- N. H. Helwa, A. B. G. Bahgat, A. M., Maximum Collectable Solar Energy by Different Solar Tracking Systems, Ene. Sou., 22, 34 (2000) [Google Scholar]
- S. Ibrahim, I. Daut, Y. M. Irwan, M. Irwanto, N. Gomesh, Z. Farhana, Linear regression model in estimating solar radiation in perlis, Ene. Proc., 18, 1412 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- F. R. Rubio, M. Berenguel, E. F. Camacho, Fuzzy logic control of a solar power plant, IEEE Trans., 3 (1995) [Google Scholar]
- C.-H. Huang, H.-Y. Pan, K.-C. Lin, Development of Intelligent Fuz. Controller for a Two-Axis Solar Tracking System, Appl. Sci., 6, 130, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. E. Hertzog J. Swart, Determining the optimum tilt angles for PV modules in a semi-arid region of S.A for the summer season (2015) [Google Scholar]
- I. Stamatescu, I. Fǎgǎrǎşan, G. Stamatescu, N. Arghira, S. S. Iliescu, Design and implementation of a solartracking algo., Proc. Eng., 69, 507 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nat. Inst. Sys. Sol., (2012) [Google Scholar]
- U. BirbilenI. Lazoglu, Design and Analysis of a Novel Miniature Tubular Linear Actuator, 54 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- O. Asowata, J. Swart, C. Pienaar, R. Schoeman, Optimum tilt and orientation angles for photovoltaic panels in the Vaal triangle, Asia-Pac. Pow. Ene. Eng. Conf. APPEEC, (2012) [Google Scholar]
- T. Juhana and A. I. Irawan, Non-intrusive load monitoring using Bluetooth Low Energy, Proc. 2015 9th Int. Conf. Tel. Syst. Serv. Appl. TSSA (2016) [Google Scholar]
- T. Kuphaldt, 7 Voltage and Current Dividers, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- A. Danladi, M. I. Puwu, Y. Michael, B. M. Garkida, Use of Fuz. Logic To Investigate Weather Parameter Impact on Electrical Load Based on Short Term Forecasting, Niger. J. Technol., 35, 567 (2016) [Google Scholar]
- A. J. Swart, P. E. Hertzog, Regularly calibrating an energy monitoring system ensures accuracy, WEENTECH Proc. Ene., 4, 45 (2019) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.