Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2020
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering & Disaster Mitigation (ICEEDM 2019)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 11
Section Seismic
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015603010
Published online 02 April 2020
  1. N.A. Abrahamson, K.O. Addo, G. Atkinson, B. Chiou, N.J., V. Silva, and R.R. Youngs, Ground Motion Characterization For BC-Hydro SSHAC Level 3 Study, Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Fronties of Erathquake Engineering, IONCEE, Anchorage, Alaska, July 2124 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. ASCE 7–10, 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1 edition, ISBN-10:0784410852. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boore D.M., Stewart J.P., Seyhan E. and Atkinson G.M., 2013. NGA-West 2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y., 2013. NGA- West2 Campbell-Bozorgnia Ground Motion Model for the horizontal Components of PGA, PGV and 5%-Damped Elastic Pseudo-Acceleration Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 sec, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2013/6, pp.xii+75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiou, B., and Youngs, R., 2008. An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1),173–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cornell, C.A., 1968. Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 1583-1606. [Google Scholar]
  7. FEMA, 2009. NEHRP Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures, FEMA P - 750/2009 Edition, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
  8. Indonesian Standard Code, Earthquake Resistance Design for Buildings (SNI 03-1726-2002), National Standardization Agency, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Indonesian Standard Code, Earthquake Resistance Design for Buildings (SNI 03-1726-2012), National Standardization Agency, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kircher, C., 2009. Basis for the New-Risk-targeted Ground Motion Maps, in COSMOS Annual Meeting Technical Session, Millbrae, CA, November 6 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  11. Kircher & Associates Consulting Engineers, 2015, Investigation of an Identified Short-coming in the Seismic Design Procedures of ASCE 7-10 and Development of Recommended Improvements for ASCE-7-16, Building Seismic Safety Council National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liel, A.B., Luco, Nicolas, Raghunandan, Meera, Champion, Casey P., 2015, Modification to Risk- Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards, in 12th International Conference on Application of Statistic and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP), Vancouver, Canada, July 12– 15 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Luco, Nicolas, Ellingwood, B.R., Hamburger, R.O., Hooper, J.D., Kimball, J.K., and Kircher, C.A., 2007, Risk-Targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States, pp. 163175, in Structural Engineers Association of California 2007 Convention Proceedings, Callifornia. [Google Scholar]
  14. Luco, N., Bachman, R.E., Crouse, C.B., Harris, J.R., Hooper, J.D, Kircher, C.A., Caldwell, P.J., and Rukstales, K.S., 2015. Updates to Building-Code Maps for the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions, Earthquake Spectra Volume 31, Number S1, December 2015, pp. S245–S271. [Google Scholar]
  15. Irsyam et al., 2017, National Center for Earthquake Studies (PuSGeN): Peta Sumber dan Bahaya Gempa Indonesia Tahun 2017, ISBN: 978-6025489-01-3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sengara, IW., Masyhur, I., Merati, G.W., Sidi, I.D., Suarjana, M., Mulia, A., Yulman, M.A., Hutabarat, D., 2012. Development MCER (Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake) through Investigation of Hazard and Fragility Curve</i>, Research Report - IMHERE Project B.2C FTSL, Institut Teknologi Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sengara, IW., Masyhur, I., Sidi, I.D., Mulia, A., Asrurifak, M., Hutabarat, D., 2015. Development of Earthquake Risk-Targeted Ground Motion for Indonesian Earthquake Resistance Building Code SNI 1726-2012, in 12th International Conference on Application of Statistic and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP), July 12–15 (2015), Vancouver, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sengara, IW., Yulman, M.A., Sumiartha, P., Mulia, A. 2016. Development on Risk-Based Seismic Design Criteria and Ground Motions for High-Rise Buildings in Jakarta, in the 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation (ICEEDM). Bali, Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sidi, I.D., 2011. Research Report: Hazard Analysis and Probability Based Factor of Safety, Structural Engineering Division, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Youngs, R.R., Chiou, S.J., Silva, W.J., & Humphrey, J.R., 1997. Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes, Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 58–73. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao John, X., Zhang, J., Asano, A., Ohno, Y., Oouchi, T., Takahashi, T., Ogawa, H., Irikura, K., Thio, H., & Somerville, P., 2006. Attenuation Relations of Strong Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 898 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.