Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 158, 2020
2019 7th International Conference on Environment Pollution and Prevention (ICEPP 2019)
Article Number 06005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Economy and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015806005
Published online 23 March 2020
  1. Anderson, M. (1995). Vulnerability to disaster and sustainable development: A general framework for assessing vulnerability. Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development: Economic and Policy Issues. . Washington, DC:: World Bank,. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balica, S.P. (2013). Balica, S.F., Popescu, I., Beevers, L. and Wrig Parametric and physically based modelling techniques for flood risk and vulnerability assessment: a comparison. . Balica, S.F., Popescu, I., Beevers, L. and Wright, N.G., 2013. Parametric and physically based modelling techniqu Environmental modelling & software, Balica, S.F., Popescu, I., Beevers, L. and Wright, N.G., 2013. Parametric and physically based modelling techniques fo pp.84-92. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, E.P. (2009). Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D. and G Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem service. Ecology letters, 12(12), pp.1394-1404. [Google Scholar]
  4. Biggs, R.S. (2015). Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in socialecological systems. . Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. Birkmann, J., 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks a Towards disaster resilient societies, 1, Birkmann, J., 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and dpp.9-54. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooks, N. 2.-1. (2003). Brooks, N., 2003. Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper, 38(38), pp.1-16. Brooks, N., 2003. Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper, 38(38), pp.1-16, pp.1-16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carreño, M.C. (2005). Evaluation of the risk management performance. . Carreño, M.L., Cardona, [Google Scholar]
  8. O.D. and Barbat, A.H., 2005. Evaluation of the risk management performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference: 250th Anniversary of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chow, T.M. (1988). Applied Hydrology. . New York: McGraw-Hill, . [Google Scholar]
  10. Cutter, S. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in human geography, 20(20), pp.529-539. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cutter, S.B. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(7). [Google Scholar]
  12. Driessen, P.H. (2018.). Driessen, P., Hegger, D., Kundzewicz, Z., van Rijswick, H., Crabbé, A., Larrue, C., ... & Raa Governance strategies for improving flood resilience in the face of climate change. . Driessen, P., Hegger, D., Kundzewicz, Z., van Rijswick, H., Crabbé, A., Larrue, C., ... & Raadgever, G. (2018). Water,., Driessen, P., Hegger, D., Kundzewicz, Z., van Rijswick, H., Crabbé, A., Larrue, C., ... & Raadgever, G. (2018). G10(11), 1595. [Google Scholar]
  13. Emanuelsson, M.A. (2014). Flood risk assessment for infrastructure networks. Journal of Flood Risk Management, , 7(7), 31-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Francesch-Huidobro, M.D. (2017). Francesch-Huidobro, M., Dabrowski, M., Tai, Y., Chan, [Google Scholar]
  15. F.Governance challenges of flood-prone delta cities: Integrating flood risk management and climate change in spatial planning. . Progress in Planning, 114, pp.1-27. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuchs, S.K. (2017). Fuchs, S., Karagiorgos, K., Kitikidou, K., Maris, F., Paparrizos, S. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: A contribution to the socio-hydrology debate. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(21), Fuchs, S., Karagiorgos, K., Kitikidou, K., Maris, F., Paparrizos, S. and Thaler, T., 2017. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: A copp.3183-3198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gallopin, G. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16 (3), 293–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, C. a R. (1989). Flooding and the quantification of ‘intangibles’. Water and Environment Journal, 3(3),, pp.27-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haasnoot, M.a. (2012). Haasnoot, M. and Midde A history of futures: a review of scenario use in water policy studies in the Netherlands. Environmental science & policy, 19, pp.108-120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hutter, G. (2007). Strategic planning for long-term flood risk management: some suggestions for learning how to make strategy at region. International Planning Studies, 12(12),, pp.273-289. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jonkman, S.a. (2008). Loss of life due to floods. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 1(1), , pp.4356. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kryžanowski, A.B. (2014). Structural flood-protection measures referring to several European case studies. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 14(14), , pp.135-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kundzewicz, Z.K.-W. (2014.) Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(59), pp.1-28. [Google Scholar]
  24. Merz, B.E. (2009). Significance of” high probability/low damage” versus” low probability/high damage” flood events. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(9), pp.1033-1046., pp.1033-1046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Naess, L.N. (2006). Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decisionmaking on climate change in Norway. . Naess, L.O., Norland, I.T., Lafferty, W.M. and Aall, C., 2006. Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to aGlobal Environmental Change, 16(16), pp.221-233. [Google Scholar]
  26. Opperman, J.G. (2009). Opperman, J.J., Galloway, G.E., Fargione, J., Mount, J.F., Richter, [Google Scholar]
  27. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Opperman, J.J., Galloway, G.E., Fargione, J., Mount, J.F., Richter, B.D. and Secchi, S., 20 Science, 326(326), pp.1487148. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pahl-Wostl, C.D. (2005). Transition to adaptive water management: the NeWater Project. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ran, J.a.-B. (2016). Ran, J. and N Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure. . Ran, J. and NedovicBudic, Z., 2016. Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 57, Ran, J. and Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2016. Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the pp.68-79. [Google Scholar]
  30. Restemeyer, B., van den Brink, M., & Woltjer, J. (2018). Restemeyer, B., van den Brink, M., & Resilience unpacked–framing of ‘uncertainty’and ‘adaptability’in long-term flood risk management strategies for London and Rotterdam. Restemeyer, B., van den Brink, M., & Woltjer, J. (2018). Resilience unpacked–framing of ‘uncertainty’and ‘adaptability’in longterm floodEuropean planning studies, Restemeyer, B., van den Brink, M., & Woltjer, J. (2018). Resilience unpacked–framing of ‘uncertainty’and ‘adaptability’in long-term flood 26(26), 1559-1579. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sayers, Y.L.-R. (2013). Flood Risk Management: A Strategic Approach. . Paris, : UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
  32. Scott. (2013). Living with flood risk/The more we know, the more we know we don’t know:. Planning Theory & Practice 14, no. 1, 103-140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smits, A., Nienhuis, P., & Saeijs, H. (2006). Changing estuaries, changing views. . Hydrobiologia, 339–355. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tempels, B.a. (2014). A co-evolving frontier between land and water: dilemmas of flexibility versus robustness in flood risk management. Water international, 39(39),, pp.872-883. [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner B.L. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, pp.570-576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wrachien, D.M. (2011). Wrachien, D., Mambretti, S. and Flood management and risk assessment in floodprone areas: Measures and solutions. Irrigation and Drainage, 60(60), pp.229-240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang, J.Z. (2018). Yang, J., Zhou, M., Li, M., Liu, X., Yin, P., Sun, Q., Wang, J., Wu, H., [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Vulnerability to the impact of temperature variability on mortality in 31 major Chinese cities. Yang, J., Zhou, M., Li, M., Liu, X., Yin, P., Sun, Q., Wang, J., Wu, H., Wang, B. and Liu, Q., 2018. Vulnerability to the impaEnvironmental Pollution, pp.631-637. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zandvoort, M.v. (2019). ZZandvoort, M., van der Brugge, R., van der Vlist, M.J., & van den Brink, Dealing with uncertainty in collaborative planning: developing adaptive strategies for the IJsselmeer. Zandvoort, M., van der Brugge, R., van der Vlist, M.J., & van den Brink, A. [Google Scholar]
  40. (2019). Dealing with uncertainty in collaborative planning: developing adaJournal of [Google Scholar]
  41. Environmental Planning and Management, Zandvoort, M., van der Brugge, R., van der Vlist, M.J., & van den Brink, A. (2019). Dealing with uncertainty in collaborative planning: [Google Scholar]
  42. developin 62(62), 248-265. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.