Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2020
International Conference on Efficient Production and Processing (ICEPP-2020)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016101011
Published online 15 April 2020
  1. European Union 2016, Energy balance sheets, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2018). DOI: 10.2785/02631. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Georgeson, M. Maslin, M. Poessinouw, Geo: Geography and Environment, 4, 1, e00036 (2017). DOI: 10.1002/geo2.36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Ganebnykh, A. Mottaeva, T. Larinina, E. Petrova, MATEC Web of Conferences, 170, 01044 (2018). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001044. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Locmelis, D. Blumberga, U. Bariss, Energy Procedia, 147, 202-206 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.012. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Bertoldi, F. Diluiso, L. Castellazzi, N. Labanca, T. Serrenho, Energy Consumption and Energy Efficiency, Publications Office of the European Union, Italy (2018). DOI: 10.2760/6684. [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Potekhin, V. Mischenko, A. Mottaeva, A. Zheltenkov, E3S Web of Conferences, 33, 03020 (2018). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20183303020. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. EEA, Trends and drivers in greenhouse gas emissions in the EU in 2016, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen (2018). DOI: 10.2800/691394. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Zhikun, F. Ze, V.W.Y. Tam, B. Yu, L. Shenghan, I.M. Chethana, S. Illankoon, M. Sungkonb, Building and Environment, 133, 32-40 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.012. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Bowen, K. Kuralbayeva, E.L. Tipoec, Energy Economics, 72, 263-275 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.015. [Google Scholar]
  10. W.A. Pelser, J.C. Vosloo, M.J. Mathews, Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 642-653 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.071. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Ridauraa, S. Llorens-Cerveraa, C. Carrilloc, I. Buj-Corral, C. Riba-Romevaa, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 131, 75-85 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Dieterle, Ph. Schäfer, T. Viere, Procedia CIRP, 69, 764-768 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.058. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Meshcheryakova, MATEC Web of Conferences, 106, 06021 (2017). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710606021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Meshcheryakova, E. Tkacheva, D. Kabanova, MATEC Web of Conferences, 193, 03004 (2018). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819303004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Meshcheryakova, MATEC Web of Conferences, 193, 05005 (2018). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819303004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.